green
Positive treatment
0.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sunshine Construction & Engineering, Inc. v. United States
Co. v. United States, 347 F.2d 509 , 535, 171 Ct.Cl. 324 , 367 (Ct.Cl.1965) (quoting Schmoll v. United States, 91 Ct.Cl. 1, 28 , 1940 WL 4133 (1940)), rev’d on other grounds, 385 U.S. 138 , 87 S.Ct. 350 , 17 L.Ed.2d 249 (1966); see also United States v. United Eng’g & Constructing Co., 234 U.S. 236, 242 , 49 Ct.Cl. 689 , 34 S.Ct. 843 , 58 L.Ed. 1294 (1914) (holding that in order to enforce liquidated damages clause, party assessing damages must not prevent performance under contract, and that if it does, even if completion is “delayed by the fault of the contractor, the rule of the origi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING CO.
v.
United States
v.
United States
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1913.
Day.
Published
Mr. Justice Day
delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court June 8, 1914.