Hollywood Brands v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 326 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Hollywood Brands v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 326 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: William Turner v. Air Transport Lodge 1894 (ca2, 1978-12-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) William Turner v. Air Transport Lodge 1894
2d Cir. · 1978 · confidence medium
In so doing, this Court noted that the Rosen case was one "involving important questions of law" and noted that, after Judge Levet's decision, our opinion in Salzhandler v. Caputo, above cited, had been handed down (326 F.2d at 401). 13 There is the same distinction between the case at bar and Hurwitz v. Directors Guild, 364 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 385 U.S. 971 , 87 S.Ct. 508 , 17 L.Ed.2d 435 (1966).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Turner v. Air Transport Lodge 1894 of International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
2d Cir. · 1978 · confidence medium
In so doing, this Court noted that the Rosen case was one “involving important questions of law” and noted that, after Judge Levet’s decision, our opinion in Salzhandler v. Caputo, above cited, had been handed down (326 F.2d at 401).
discussed Cited "see" Mandaglio v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
E.D.N.Y · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
This means only that before any action is taken against him he must be informed of the charges and be given an opportunity to hear them and refute them.”); accord Rosen v. Painters Union, 198 F.Supp. 46, 48 (S.D.N.Y.1961), appeal dismissed, 326 F.2d 400 (2d Cir.1964) (per curiam), nor from the failure to produce Zeh, the alleged accuser, as a witness, inasmuch as he would have produced nothing exculpatory or relevant.
discussed Cited "see" Mandaglio v. UNITED BROTH. OF CARP. & JOIN. OF AM.
E.D.N.Y · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
This means only that before any action is taken against him he must be informed of the charges and be given an opportunity to hear them and refute them."); accord Rosen v. Painters Union, 198 F.Supp. 46, 48 (S.D.N.Y.1961), appeal dismissed, 326 F.2d 400 (2d Cir.1964) ( per curiam ), nor from the failure to produce Zeh, the alleged accuser, as a witness, inasmuch as he would have produced nothing exculpatory or relevant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HOLLYWOOD BRANDS, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
20540_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 29, 1964.
326 F.2d 400
Fred S. Ball, Jr., Montgomery, Ala., for petitioner., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Rives, Cameron, Hunter.
Published
PER CURIAM.

On rehearing petitioner earnestly urges that the questions of (1) whether it refused to bargain in good faith on contract changes proposed by the union, (2) whether it refused to furnish to the union access to'pertinent wage date, and (3) whether its grant of a wage increase without consulting the union amounted to a violation of sections 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act presented issues of law rather than of fact as held in our per curiam opinion enforcing the order of the Board. 324 F.2d 956. We disagree. The law concerning all three questions is so well settled as not to justify further discussion. The only debatable question concerns the Board’s factual inferences and findings which, in our opinion, are supported by substantial evidence in the record. The petition for l'ehearing is

Denied,