Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Riley Aeronautics Corp., 377 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Riley Aeronautics Corp., 377 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fuller v. Commissioner (tax, 1986-01-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Fuller v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See and compare McLane v. Commissioner, 46 T.C. 140 , 145 (1966) , affd. per curiam 377 F.2d 557 ↩ (9th Cir. 1967) . 7.
discussed Cited "see" Van Raden v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See McLane, Jr. v. Commissioner , 46 T.C. 140 (1966) , affd. per curiam 377 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1967) , wherein we stated (at page 145): The building may not be constructed entirely from tax advantage, but, if the *200 foundations and bricks have economic substance, the economic or financial inducement of the tax advantage can provide the mortar.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Teong-Chan Gaw v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., *658 McLane v. Commissioner , 46 T.C. 140 , 145 (1966) , affd. per curiam 377 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1967) .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Fortuna Broom Company, South Texas Broom Corn Company and J. L. Beck v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
5th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Safety Engineering & Supply Co., 5 Cir., 374 F.2d 885 [March 23, 1967]; see also NLRB v. Riley Aeronautics Corp., 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 557 [June 6, 1967].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Riley Aeronautics Corporation
23600_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 6, 1967.
377 F.2d 557
Published

377 F.2d 557

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
RILEY AERONAUTICS CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 23600.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 6, 1967.

Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Florida Case).

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner.

John E. Jenkins, Jr., Huntington, W. Va., Jenkins, Schaub & Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., for appellee.

Before BROWN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and SUTTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The opposition of the Respondent to the Board's petition for enforcement is so devoid of any possible merit that the Court, upon completion of the Board's argument, ordered from the bench that the order be enforced.

2

Order enforced.