Nina Footwear Co., Inc. v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Nina Footwear Co., Inc. v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“i recognize that where the affidavit of a party opposing summary judgment differs from, or varies his evidence as given by deposition, the conflict may disclose an issue of credibility requiring trial.”
78 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Edward Atherton and Rebecca Atherton v. Phyllis S. Lewis, Trustee, et al. for Phyllis S. Lewis Trust Dated January 21, 2015 (vtd, 2026-03-06) · Strongest negative: Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. (pasuperct, 1980-01-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1980 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Pervel Industries, Inc. v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn. 1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979). 24 .
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Edward Atherton and Rebecca Atherton v. Phyllis S. Lewis, Trustee, et al. for Phyllis S. Lewis Trust Dated January 21, 2015
D. Vt. · 2026 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
i recognize that where the affidavit of a party opposing summary judgment differs from, or varies his evidence as given by deposition, the conflict may disclose an issue of credibility requiring trial.
discussed Cited "see" General Electric Company v. New York State Department Of Labor
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
It sought to "preempt all state laws that relate to employee benefit plans and not just state laws which purport to regulate an area expressly covered by ERISA." Wadsworth v. Whaland, 562 F.2d 70, 77 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 980 , 98 S.Ct. 1630 , 56 L.Ed.2d 72 (1978); see Pervel Indus., Inc. v. State of Connecticut Comm'n on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc., 625 F.2d 1344, 1351 (8th Cir.1980). 14 A state law "r…
discussed Cited "see" General Electric Co. v. New York State Department of Labor
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
It sought to “preempt all state laws that relate to employee benefit plans and not just state laws which purport to regulate an area expressly covered by ERISA.” Wadsworth v. Whaland, 562 F.2d 70, 77 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 980 , 98 S.Ct. 1630 , 56 L.Ed.2d 72 (1978); see Pervel Indus., Inc. v. State of Connecticut Comm’n on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc., 625 F.2d 1344, 1351 (8th Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" Dawson v. Whaland
D.N.H. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pervel Industries, Inc. v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff'd mem., 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980). 15 .
cited Cited "see" United States Postal Service v. Athena Products, Ltd.
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Original Cosmetics Products, Inc. v. Strachan, 459 F.Supp. 496 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff’d 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 444 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 229 , 62 L.Ed.2d 170 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. Bone
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Price v. Worldvision Enterprises, Inc., 455 F.Supp. 252, 260 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) (affidavit testimony departs “so markedly from the prior deposition of defendants’ key witness, ... as to brand as bogus the factual issues sought to be raised”), aff’d, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979) .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whyde v. Sigsworth
N.D. Ohio · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Dollar Stores of Michigan, LLC, 3 F.4th 832, 842 (6th Cir. 2021) (citing Aerel, 448 F.3d at 908 )); see also Price v. Worldvision Enterprises, Inc., 455 F. Supp. 252, 260 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (affidavit testimony departs “so markedly from the prior deposition of defendants’ key witness, . . . as to brand as bogus the factual issues sought to be raised”), aff’d, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thompson v. Bd. of Ed. of Romeo Community Schools
W.D. Mich. · 1981 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations, 599 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980) (rejecting preemption of state fair employment law as it applies to employee benefit plans) with Pervel v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn. 1978), aff’d. 603 F.2d 214 (2nd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980) (holding ERISA preempts Connecticut’s fair employment law as it applies to benefit plans).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nina Footwear Co., Inc.
v.
J. C. Penney Co., Inc
78-7502.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 7, 1979.
603 F.2d 214
Published

603 F.2d 214

Nina Footwear Co., Inc.
v.
J. C. Penney Co., Inc.

No. 78-7502

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

3/7/79

1

S.D.N.Y.

VACATED AND REMANDED