Sec'y of Labor v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc., 43 F.3d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Sec'y of Labor v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc., 43 F.3d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re: Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation (ca2, 2010-04-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" In re: Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation
2d Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Inwood Labs., Inc. v. Young, 723 F. Supp. 1523 (D.D.C. 1989), vacated as moot, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C.
cited Cited "see" Arkansas Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund v. Bayer AG
2d Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Inwood Labs., Inc. v. Young, 723 F.Supp. 1523 (D.D.C.1989), vacated as moot, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C.Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation
E.D.N.Y · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Inwood Labs., Inc. v. Young, 723 F.Supp. 1523 (D.D.C.1989) (finding precursor policy of FDA allowing exclusivity only when ANDA IV filer has been sued in patent litigation unenforceable), vacated as moot, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C.Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena (2×)
SCOTUS · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Autek Systems Corp. v. United States, 835 F. Supp. 13 (DC 1993) (upholding Small Business Administration decision that minority business owner’s personal income disqualified him from DBE status under § 8(a) program), aff’d, 43 F. 3d 712 (CADC 1994).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Olson
D.D.C. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
P. 32(i)(2); see also, e.g., United States v. Jones, 43 F.3d 712 , 1994 WL 665103, at *3 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Pedro.
Haw. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jordan, 759 F. Supp. 902, 904 (D.D.C. 1991) (identifying five factors that courts usually consider in evaluating whether “fair and just” reasons justify withdrawal of plea), aff’d, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd. v. Leavitt
D.D.C. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp. v. Shalala, 140 F.3d 1060, 1069 (D.C.Cir.1998); see also Inwood Labs., Inc. v. Young, 723 F.Supp. 1523, 1525 (D.D.C.), vacated as moot, 43 F.3d 712 , 1989 WL 513201 (D.C.Cir.1989) (holding that the *4 FDA’s interpretation that “the 180-day exclusivity commences only when the primary ANDA has been sued for patent infringement” is contrary to the clear statutory language) (internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Henney
D.D.C. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Recent court decisions challenging the agency’s interpretation of requirements found in the FDA’s regulations, specifically at 21 C.F.R. § 314.107 (c)(1), prompted the FDA to issue a “formal” position in the form of a “Guidance For Industry.” (See Pharm.Mot. for Prelim.Inj., Ex. 4, Guidance); see also Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Young, 723 F.Supp. 1523 (D.D.C.), vacated as moot, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C.Cir.1989); Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala, 955 F.Supp. 128 (D.D.C.1997) {“Mova 1997”) (FDA enjoined from enforcing successful defense requirement in C.F.R. 314.107(c)(1)); Granu…
Secretary of Labor
v.
Bethenergy Mines, Inc.
93-1475.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Nov 9, 1994.
43 F.3d 712
Unpublished

43 F.3d 712

310 U.S.App.D.C. 61

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
SECRETARY OF LABOR, et al., Petitioners,
v.
BETHENERGY MINES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 93-1475.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1994.

Before: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This cause came to be heard on a petition for review of the decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission in Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 15 F.M.S.H.R.C. 981 (1993). The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 36(b).

2

For substantially the reasons stated by the Commission, it is

3

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the decision by the FMSHRC is affirmed; and it is

4

ORDERED that the petition for review is denied.

5

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15.