Loo Way v. United States, 72 F. 688 (9th Cir. 1896).

Loo Way v. United States, 72 F. 688 (9th Cir. 1896). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.2 score

2 citation events across 1 distinct court.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

LOO WAY
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 248.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Feb 3, 1896.

72 F. 688

1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1742

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Haines & Ward, for plaintiff in error., Henry S. Foote, for the United States.

Gilbert, Hawley, Mekenna.

Published

PER CURIAM.

The facts of the case are fully stated by the learned judge who tried the case in the district court, and, for the reasons and authorities (to the latter it is only necessary to add Lai Moy v. U. S., 14 C. C. A. 283, 66 Fed. 955, and Lew Jim v. U. S., 14 C. C. A. 281, 66 Fed. 953, decided by this court) expressed and cited by him, the judgment is affirmed.