Barry v. Morris Plan Indus. Bank, 141 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Barry v. Morris Plan Indus. Bank, 141 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Gene Paul Master, Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupts-Appellants (ca9, 1977-11-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Gene Paul Master, Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupts-Appellants
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also 5 U.S.C. § 8346 (c) (1971) (federal employees’ pension benefits “not assignable, either in law or equity, or subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process.”) (predecessor statute held bankruptcy exemption in In re Barry (E.D.N.Y.1943) 52 F.Supp. 492, 493 , aff’d (2d Cir. 1944) 141 F.2d 1021 ); In re Houchins (S.D.W.Va.1937) 17 F.Supp. 556, 556-58 (proceeds, of bonds exempt in bankruptcy where bonds are not “transferable, assignable, subject to attachment, levy or seizure under any legal or equitable process” by federal law).) These federal st…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hugh J. BARRY, Bankrupt-Appellee
v.
MORRIS PLAN INDUSTRIAL BANK OF NEW YORK, Objecting Creditor-Appellant
No. 299.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 24, 1944.
141 F.2d 1021
Henry W. Parker, of New York City, for appellant., Friedman & Friedman, of New York City (Hyman R. Friedman, of New York City, of counsel), for bankrupt-appellee.
Clark, Frank, Hand.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Order granting the discharge of the bankrupt and reversing the order of the referee denying his discharge affirmed upon opinion below, In re Barry, 52 F.Supp. 492.