McCullough v. Kammerer Corp., 143 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
McCullough v. Kammerer Corp., 143 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCullough
v.
Kammerer CORPORATION
No. 9957.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 1, 1944.
143 F.2d 595
R. Welton Whann, of Los Angeles, Cal., and A. W. Boyken, of San Francisco, Cal., if or appellant., Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.

In his petition for rehearing appellant has cited Kellogg No. 657,777, Hill No. 1,338,773, and Segelhorst No. 1,599,067 and No. 1,767,018 as being demonstrative of anticipation of Reilly-Stone No. 1,625,391. We do not find in these patents such anticipation.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge dissents.