Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, 145 F.2d 470 (4th Cir. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, 145 F.2d 470 (4th Cir. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp. v. Winco Tankers, Inc. (laed, 1968-01-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp. v. Winco Tankers, Inc.
E.D. La. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Bill, D.C.Md., 1942, 47 F.Supp. 969 , aff’d 145 F.2d 470 ; Imperial Sugar Co. v. Bright Star S.S.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz Horn v. Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Alabama Fruit and Produce Companu, Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Albama Fruit and Produce Company v. Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz Horn
5th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., The Bill, D.C.Md.1942, 47 F.Supp. 969 , aff'd Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc., 4 Cir., 145 F.2d 470 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Horn v. Cia de Navegacion Fruco
5th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., The Bill, D.C.Md.1942, 47 F.Supp. 969 , aff’d Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc., 4 Cir., 145 F.2d 470 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oivind LORENTZEN, Director and Curator of Shipping of the Royal Norwegian Government, Claimant of the BILL, Appellant,
v.
BRAZIL OITICICA, Inc., Appellee.
5312.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 20, 1944.
145 F.2d 470
Soper and Dobie, Circuit Judges, and Harry E. Watkins, District Judge.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Carver W. Wolfe, of New York City (Hatch & Wolfe, of New York City, and Ritchie, Janney, Ober & Williams and Robert W. Williams, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.

Henry N. Longley, of New York City (Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City, and Lord & Whip and George W. P. Whip, all of Baltimore, Md., and F. Herbert Prem, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge, 47 F.Supp. 969.

Affirmed.