green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kim v. Saccento
That “rendered moot” all of Kim’s pending discovery motions, Weiss v. United States, 199 F.2d 454, 455 (2d Cir. 1952); see also Cooper v. Salomon Bros., 1 F.3d 82, 87 (2d Cir. 1993), including his underlying motion to enforce the subpoena that Prudential had moved to quash.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Eugene Westrope, John Jetter, Loretta Jetter, and Joe Alday, Nathan Overstreet, Jr.
The Second Circuit stated in Weiss v. United States, 199 F.2d 454, 455 (2d Cir.1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 504 , 97 L.Ed. 718 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 914 , 73 S.Ct. 643 , 97 L.Ed. 1348 (1953), that the dismissal of a complaint rendered moot motions filed by the plaintiff to compel a party to submit to further discovery.
discussed
Cited "see"
Freeman v. Kirisits
See Weiss v. United States, 199 F.2d 454, 455 (2d Cir. 1952) (holding that “[d]ismissal of the complaint rendered moot the plaintiff’s [discovery] motions”). 13 * * * We have considered Freeman’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burk v. United States
See Weiss v. U. S., D.C.N.Y., 103 F.Supp. 470, 473 , affirmed per curiam, 2 Cir., 199 F.2d 454 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 504 , 97 L.Ed. 718 ; and this, in our opinion, she has failed to do.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Adele Weiss, Claimant-Appellant v. The United States of America
See also 2 Cir., 199 F.2d 454 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gillen
v.
United States
v.
United States
13276_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 28, 1952.
199 F.2d 454
John R. Golden, San Francisco, Cal., Spurgeon Avakian, Oakland, Cal., Lohse & Fry, Reno, Nev., and Herbert Chamberlin, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Miles N. Pike, U. S. Atty., Bruce R. Thompson, Robert McDonald, Asst. U. S. Atty., Reno, Nev., Ellis N. Slack, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Healy, Pope, Harrison.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
The payment of the fine in the above case under the authority of Hanback v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 35 A.2d 189, and cases therein cited has rendered this case moot, and therefore this appeal is ordered dismissed.