neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilbur O. ARCHIE, Appellant,
v.
SHELL OIL COMPANY, Inc., Et Al., Appellees
v.
SHELL OIL COMPANY, Inc., Et Al., Appellees
14734.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 30, 1954.
210 F.2d 653
I. H. Spears, in pro. per., Gordon O. Ewin, New Orleans, La., Elton A. Darsey, Houma, La., H. H. Hillyer, Jr., Ernest M. Sutter, New Orleans, La., for appellees.
Hutcheson, Holmes, Borah.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
In his will considered and thoughtful opinion, [1] stating the issues joined and the facts proved, the district judge canvassed and disposed of, adversely to him, plaintiff’s claims.
Upon full and careful consideration of the opinion in the light of the record, the briefs and the oral arguments, we find ourselves in agreement with the conclusions reached by the district judge. We will not, therefore, write other than to say that, for the reasons given by the district judge in support of it, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
1
. Archie v. Shell Oil Co., D.C., 110 F. Supp. 542.