The United States of Am. v. Richard Albert Mango, 221 F.2d 479 (7th Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Search
The United States of Am. v. Richard Albert Mango, 221 F.2d 479 (7th Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Albert MANGO, Defendant-Appellant
11159_1.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Apr 13, 1955.
221 F.2d 479
Karl M. Milgrom, Chicago, 111., Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant., Robert Tieken, U. S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, William T. Hart, Anna R. La-vin, Asst. U. S. Attys., Chicago, 111., for appellee.
Finnegan, Lindley, Schnackenberg.
Published
FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Gonzales v. United States, 75 S.Ct. 409 was decided while Mango’s appeal was under advisement in this court. In its motion, filed April 4, 1955, the Government concedes that a major point asserted before us, on Mango’s behalf, is controlled by the Gonzales opinion. We agree.

Accordingly, plaintiff-appellee’s motion to reverse the judgment of conviction entered below (on January 27,1954) and to discharge the defendant-appellant is granted. Judgment of the District Court is reversed, the conviction set aside, and defendant discharged.