United States v. R. F. Ball Constr. Co., Inc., & United Pac. Ins. Co., 239 F.2d 384 (5th Cir. 1956). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. R. F. Ball Constr. Co., Inc., & United Pac. Ins. Co., 239 F.2d 384 (5th Cir. 1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Southern Utilities (gamd, 1983-01-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Southern Utilities
M.D. Ga. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Newman v. Granger, 141 F.Supp. 37, 39 (W.D.Pa.1956), aff’d per curiam, 239 F.2d 384 (3d Cir.1957) (agreement on all necessary and relevant facts permits decision on the merits).
cited Cited "see" Pifcho v. Brewer
M.D. Penn. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Newman v. Granger, 141 F.Supp. 37, 39 (W.D.Pa. 1956), aff’d per curiam, 239 F.2d 384 (3d Cir. 1957) (agreement on all necessary and relevant facts permits decision on the merits).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Loe v. Wilkinson
M.D. Penn. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Newman v. Granger, 141 F.Supp. 37, 39 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd per curiam, 239 F.2d 384 (3d Cir.1957) (agreement on all necessary and relevant facts permits decision on the merits).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company
16276.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 26, 1956.
239 F.2d 384
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

239 F.2d 384

57-1 USTC P 9269

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
R. F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and United Pacific
Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 16276.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1956.

A. F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.

Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce & Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.

Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60. For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is

2

Affirmed.