green
Positive treatment
11.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rodriguez v. Editor in Chief
Housing Ass’n, 269 F.2d 517, 517 (D.C.Cir.1959).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dasisa v. University of District of Columbia Board of Trustees
Housing Ass’n, 269 F.2d 517, 517 (D.C.Cir.1959).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Meador v. First Security National Bank
Housing Ass’n, 269 F.2d 517, 517 (D.C.Cir.1959) (trial court may apply res judicata upon taking notice of parties’ previous case); Wilson v. United States, 166 F.2d 527, 528-29 (8th Cir.1948) (appellate court on own motion may determine action is barred by res judicata); Holmes v. United States, 231 F.Supp. 971, 972-73 (N.D.Ga.1964), aff'd, 353 F.2d 785 (5th Cir.1965).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
American Federation of Government Employees, Council 214, Afl-Cio v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
English v. Cunningham, 269 F.2d 517, 539 (D.C.Cir.), modified on other grounds, 269 F.2d 539 , cert. de nied, 361 U.S. 897, 905 , 80 S.Ct. 195 , 4 L.Ed.2d 152, 181 (1959).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Henry Larkins v. National Labor Relations Board
Nevertheless, he did not pay this $1.50 for October dues 4 The Union steward also testified that when he explained to Larkins the consequences of non-payment, Larkins just laughed and said, "I got it beat." 5 Larkins cites English v. Cunningham, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 91 , 269 F.2d 517, 538 (1959), and Wirtz v. Teamsters, Local 191, 226 F.Supp. 179, 185 (D.Conn.1964), in support of this theory, neither of which provided sufficient support.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Larkins v. National Labor Relations Board
Larkins cites English v. Cunningham, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 91 , 269 F.2d 517, 538 (1959), and Wirtz v. Teamsters, Local 191, 226 F.Supp. 179, 185 (D.Conn.1964), in support of this theory, neither of which provided sufficient support.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Mozart G. Ratner
(2×)
D.C. 70, 74, 269 F.2d 517, 521 (1959). .
cited
Cited "see"
Forest Hills Early Learning Center, Inc. v. Lukhard
Hicks v. Holland, 235 F.2d 183 , 183 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 352 U.S. 855 , 77 S.Ct. 83 , 1 L.Ed.2d 66 (1956); accord, Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association, 269 F.2d 517, 517 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
James R. Hoffa v. Honorable F. Dickinson Letts, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Edwin D. Dorsey and Harry Bath, Intervenors. John F. English, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Honorable F. Dickinson Letts, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Edward D. Dorsey and Harry Bath, Intervenors
(2×)
See English v. Cunningham, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 70 , 269 F.2d 517 , certiorari denied, 361 U.S. 897 , 905, 80 S.Ct. 187 , 4 L.Ed.2d 153 , 181 3 We adhere to the use of the term Teamsters as adopted in English v. Cunningham, supra 4 The Interim Report filed september 14, 1959, concluded with the following: '* * * and in the event the court finds that the decree has been violated, that the court take such action as may be warranted, including without limitation, removal of defendant Hoffa from office as Provisional General President * * *.' 5 We are not concerned now with whatever power the District…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoffa v. Letts
(2×)
See English v. Cunningham, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 70 , 269 F.2d 517 , certiorari denied, 361 U.S. 897 , 905, 80 S.Ct. 187 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 153, 181 . .
cited
Cited "see"
Distinti v. Cunningham
See supplemental opinion of July 9, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. -, 269 F.2d 517, 538 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph S. GULLO and Vivian B. Gullo, Appellants,
v.
VETERANS COOPERATIVE HOUSING ASSOCIATION Et Al., Appellees
v.
VETERANS COOPERATIVE HOUSING ASSOCIATION Et Al., Appellees
14925.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 28, 1959.
Mr. Joseph S. Gullo, Arlington, Va., for appellants., Mr. Paul Daniel, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Carlyle C. Ring, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass’n. Mr. James R. Worsley, Jr., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellee Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass’n., Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, and Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.
Miller, Bazelon, Bastian.
Cited by 39 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
This case was dismissed by the District Court apparently on the ground of res judicata, the court taking judicial notice of the previous case between the parties, the details of which are spelled out in Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association, 1957, 101 U.S.App. D.C. 167, 247 F.2d 573.
In all its essential particulars, the present action is the same as that of the previous case, and the District Court correctly applied the doctrine of res judi-cata.
While the defense of laches was interposed, it is not necessary that we pass on that issue.
Affirmed.