Ruth Dodson v. Bernon L. Dodson, 288 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Ruth Dodson v. Bernon L. Dodson, 288 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Charles Daniel Everett v. United States (cadc, 1964-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Charles Daniel Everett v. United States (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1964 · confidence medium
High v. United States, supra note 11, 110 U.S.App.D.C. at 29, 288 F.2d at 431; United States v. Hughes, supra note 10 ; United States v. Guerini, 296 F.2d 33, 34 (4th Cir. 1961); United States v. Moore, 290 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 837 , 82 S.Ct. 49 , 7 L.Ed.2d 38 (1961); Vasquez v. United States, supra note 15; United States v. Nigro, supra note 10 at 787, 262 F.2d; United States v. Lester, supra note 15 ; United States v. Marcus, 213 F.2d 230, 232 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 39 , 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954); United States v. Panebianco, supra note…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States
9th Cir. · 1963 · confidence medium
High v. United States, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 25 , 288 F.2d 427, 429 (1961). 11 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Carl L. Combs (2×)
10th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See High v. United States, 288 F.2d 427 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 923 , 81 S.Ct. 1350 , 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Campbell v. United States
D.C. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See High v. United States, D.C.Cir., 288 F.2d 427 ; Daher v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 144 A.2d 379 ; Coleman v. District of Columbia, D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruth DODSON, Appellant,
v.
Bernon L. DODSON, Appellee
16088_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Mar 13, 1961.
288 F.2d 427
Mr. John J. Dwyer, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. Henry M. Fowler, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Miller, Edgerton, Fahy.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the petition of appellant for letters of administration on the estate of Bernon S. Dodson, deceased. The District Court found after the taking of testimony that petitioner had not sustained the burden of proof showing that she was decedent’s comr mon-law wife. Her claim to that status was the basis for her assertion of right to letters of administration. On the conflicting evidence we cannot say that the finding of the District Court was clearly erroneous, and accordingly its order is

Affirmed.