neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lee David ARWINE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William H. BANNAN, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan; And the Michigan Corrections Commission, Respondents-Appellees
v.
William H. BANNAN, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan; And the Michigan Corrections Commission, Respondents-Appellees
15295_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 10, 1963.
Lee David Arwine, in pro. per., Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor Gen., Donald T. Kane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lansing, Mich., on the brief, for respondent-appellee.
Cecil, O'Sullivan, Peck.
Published
ORDER.
Oral argument having been waived, and the case having been submitted on the brief of the petitioner-appellant and[*132] on the brief of the respondents-appellees, wherein the Attorney General and Solicitor General of the State of Michigan, as counsel for said respondents-appellees recognized that the recent opinion in the case of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963) requires such action,
It Is Ordered that the district court order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be vacated and the case remanded to the district court for consideration on its merits.