Mike Mulvihill & Jessie Pershing Lott v. United States, 326 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Mike Mulvihill & Jessie Pershing Lott v. United States, 326 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Laurest J. Trahan, Cross-Appellees v. Superior Oil Company, Cross-Appellants (ca5, 1983-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Laurest J. Trahan, Cross-Appellees v. Superior Oil Company, Cross-Appellants
5th Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
This Court affirmed by per curiam, calling attention to the “well considered opinion” of the district court and holding that Savoy’s “suit was necessarily a collateral attack on the order of the Commissioner.” Savoy v. Tidewater Oil Company, 326 F.2d 757, 758 (5th Cir.1964).
cited Cited "see" Floyd Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining Company
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Savoy v. Tidewater Oil Co., W.D.La.1963, 218 F.Supp. 607 , aff'd 5 Cir. 1964, 326 F.2d 757 ; Bonsall v. Humble Oil & Ref.
cited Cited "see" Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Savoy v. Tidewater Oil Co., W.D.La.1963, 218 F.Supp. 607 , aff’d 5 Cir. 1964, 326 F.2d 757 ; Bonsall v. Humble Oil & Ref.
discussed Cited "see" Boutte v. Chevron Oil Co. (2×)
E.D. La. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Savoy v. Tidewater Oil Co., 218 F. Supp. 607 (WD La.-1963) aff’d 326 F.2d 757 (CA 5-1964). 7 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vinson Minerals, Ltd. v. XTO Energy, Inc. (2×)
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ridl, 553 N.W.2d at 784 (lessor’s demands not “specifying in what respects” lessee breached lease, as required by notice clause, not appropriate demand entitling lessor to forfeiture), and Savoy v. Tidewater Oil Co., 218 F.Supp. 607, 610 (W.D.La.1963) (notice required lessor to “point out the particulars in which they were deemed deficient” to allow forfeiture), aff 'd, 326 F.2d 757 (5th Cir.1964), and Mont.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mike MULVIHILL and Jessie Pershing Lott, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
20787.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 29, 1964.
326 F.2d 757
Murray L. Williams, Water Valley, Miss., for appellants., H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Tuttle, Hutcheson, Gewin.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the grounds of appeal asserted by the appellants from their sentence and judgment of guilty in this prosecution for violation of the Internal Revenue Statutes relative to possession of non-tax paid whiskey and find them to be without merit.

The judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.