Corliss Lamont, on Behalf of Himself & All Others Similarly Situated v. Comm'r of Motor Vehs. & R. L. Polk & Co., 386 F.2d 449 (2d Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Corliss Lamont, on Behalf of Himself & All Others Similarly Situated v. Comm'r of Motor Vehs. & R. L. Polk & Co., 386 F.2d 449 (2d Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Edward Chin (ca2, 1991-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Edward Chin
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60, 72 , 103 S.Ct. 2875, 2883 , 77 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983) (recognizing a right to send unsolicited mailings, and noting that the “ ‘short, though regular, journey from mail box to trash can ... is an acceptable burden [on the recipient], at least so far as the Constitution is concerned’ ”) (quoting Lamont v. Comm’r of Motor Vehicles, 269 F.Supp. 880, 883 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 386 F.2d 449 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 915 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 654 (1968)).
discussed Cited "see" United States Postal Service v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
D.D.C. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60 , 103 S.Ct. 2875, 2883 , 77 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983) (“the ‘short, though regular, journey from mail box to trash can *875 ... is an acceptable burden at least so far as the Constitution is concerned’ ”)(quoting Lamont v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 269 F.Supp. 880, 883 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff'd, 386 F.2d 449 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 915 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 654 (1968)).
discussed Cited "see" Ryan v. Kirkpatrick
Mo. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lamont v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 269 F.Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), aff'd 386 F.2d 449 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 915 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 654 (1968), holding the sale by the state commissioner of motor vehicles of automobile registration information was not an onerous burden on the right of privacy.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted Gest
8th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lamont v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 269 F.Supp. 880, 883-84 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 386 F.2d 449 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 915 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 654 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Corliss Lamont, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
v.
Commissioner of Motor Vehicles and R. L. Polk & Co.
31595.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 12, 1967.
386 F.2d 449
Published

386 F.2d 449

Corliss LAMONT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES and R. L. Polk & Co., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 205.

Docket 31595.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 28, 1967.

Decided December 12, 1967.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Marvin E. Frankel, J., denying appellant's motion to convene a three-judge court and granting appellees' motion to dismiss the complaint. Opinion below reported at 269 F.Supp. 880.

Leonard Boudin, New York City (Rabinowitz & Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, David Rein, Washington, D. C., and Joan Goldberg, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Mortimer Sattler, New York City (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joel Lewittes, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.

Wyllys S. Newcomb, New York City (Royall, Koegel, Rogers & Wells, John M. O'Hara and Guy C. Quinlan, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee, R. L. Polk & Co.

Before MOORE, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm for substantially the reasons contained in the opinion of Judge Frankel reported at 269 F.Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y.1967).