Joseph Elkanich v. Myrl E. Alexander, Dir. of Bureau of Prisons & the United States, 430 F.2d 1178 (10th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Joseph Elkanich v. Myrl E. Alexander, Dir. of Bureau of Prisons & the United States, 430 F.2d 1178 (10th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pizitz, Inc. v. Pizitz Mercantile Co. of Tuscaloosa, Inc. (alnd, 1979-04-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Pizitz, Inc. v. Pizitz Mercantile Co. of Tuscaloosa, Inc.
N.D. Ala. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Elkanich v. Alexander, 315 F.Supp. 659 (D.Kan.1970), affirmed 430 F.2d 1178 (10th Cir. 1970); A & M Gregos, Inc. v. Robertory, 384 F.Supp. 187 (E.D.Pa.1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph ELKANICH, Appellant,
v.
Myrl E. ALEXANDER, Director of Bureau of Prisons and the United States, Appellee
175-70.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Aug 25, 1970.
430 F.2d 1178
Richard L. Meyer, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.
Kerr, Lewis, Per Curiam, Pickett.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant Elkanich was notified that the court was considering summary af-firmance, and thereafter appellee filed a motion to affirm, pursuant to Rule 8 of our Revised Rules, effective January 1, 1970. Although appellant was afforded an opportunity to oppose summary af-firmance, either as proposed by the court or by the appellee, he has not done so. Nonetheless, examination of the file and records in this cause prompts the conclusion that the questions presented are wholly unsubstantial and require no further argument. Accordingly, the motion of appellee is granted and the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order of the district court, 315 F.Supp. 659 (D.Kan.1970).