neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Claud Mason KELLY, Appellant
v.
Claud Mason KELLY, Appellant
25729_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 22, 1971.
435 F.2d 1288
David C. Marcus (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., Irving Prager, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), William M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffappellee.
Chambers, Wright, Kilkenny.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
The stolen trailer, not self propelled, we hold could be “goods, wares, merchandise” under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and that the court was justified in advising the jury that the trailer qualified under the section.
There was some improper hearsay admitted, but the proof was so overwhelming that we find the error was of no consequence.
Other points we have examined and find without merit.
The mandate will go down forthwith.