green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Morton International, Inc. v. Fmc Corporation
DISCUSSION 7 Ordinarily the proceedings in a district court must be final as to the all causes of action and parties for a court of appeals to have jurisdiction over an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 9 Andrews v. United States, 373 U.S. 334, 340 , 83 S.Ct. 1236, 1240 , 10 L.Ed.2d 383 (1963); Jackson v. Hart, 435 F.2d 1293, 1294 (3d Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co.
DISCUSSION Ordinarily the proceedings in a district court must be final as to the all causes of action and parties for a court of appeals to have jurisdiction over an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 9 Andrews v. United States, 373 U.S. 334, 340 , 83 S.Ct. 1236, 1240 , 10 L.Ed.2d 383 (1963); Jackson v. Hart, 435 F.2d 1293, 1294 (3d Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., 966 F.2d 777, 779 (3d Cir.1992); Jackson v. Hart, 435 F.2d 1293, 1294 (3d Cir.1970) (per curiam). 16 Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., 966 F.2d 777, 779 (3d Cir.1992); Jackson v. Hart, 435 F.2d 1293, 1294 (3d Cir.1970) (per cu-riam).
cited
Cited "see"
Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc.
See Jackson v. Hart, 435 F.2d 1293, 1294 (3d Cir.1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Bruce W. Buzzard, Administrator of the Estate of Deborah S. Buzzard, Bruce W. Buzzard, Individually, and Bruce W. Buzzard, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Lucas Buzzard, a Minor v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc. Roy L. Gerst Freuhauf Trailer Operations, a Division of Terex Trailer Corporations. Freuhauf Trailer Operations Roadrunner Trucking, Inc. And Roy L. Gerst, Cross-Claimants v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc. And Roy L. Gerst, Cross-Defendants, Bruce W. Buzzard
See Jackson v. Hart, 435 F.2d 1293, 1294 (3d Cir.1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elbert Earl WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
Louis S. NELSON, Warden, Appellee
v.
Louis S. NELSON, Warden, Appellee
25550.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 4, 1971.
435 F.2d 1293
Elbert Earl Williams, in pro. per., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Albert W. Harris, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Deraid E. Granberg, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Hamley, Merrill, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
At the petitioner’s first state trial, a witness testified against him and apparently was competently and thoroughly cross examined. At his second state trial, the same witness claimed and received the protection of the Fifth Amendment when she refused to testify. So the state put in the record her testimony at the first trial.
Under the circumstances here, the right of confrontation at the first trial’ was sufficient. See United States v. Mobley, 5 Cir., 421 F.2d 345, and Jones v. California, 9 Cir., 364 F.2d 522.
Other points, which we do not list, we find without merit.