neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.4 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
James Gilbert HAYS, Appellant
v.
James Gilbert HAYS, Appellant
25949.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 11, 1971.
Philip Mahoney (argued), Seattle, Wash., for appellant., Chas. Pinnell, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Chambers, Browning, Carter.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We have not considered on the merits the point of the denial of the motion for new trial. At the time it was before the district court, that court had no jurisdiction to consider it. (The case was never remanded.) We assume the motion or another one may be regularly considered now.
Other points raised we have considered and find without merit.