green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Williams, Issac
See, e.g., United States v. Neiss, 684 F.2d 570, 572 (8th Cir. 1982) (observing that, in the Eighth Circuit, “there is a requirement of calling the trial court’s attention to the specific fact situation that would warrant giving the lesser- included offense instruction”); United States v. Lumpkins, 439 F.2d 494, 496 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Pete on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Louis Belton, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellees v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Harry Huge, and United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirementfund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Who Have Been Deniedpension Payments From the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirementfund v. W. A. Boyle
See also Collins v. UMWA Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 387 , 439 F.2d 494 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pete v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare & Retirement Fund of 1950
See also Collins v. UMWA Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 387 , 439 F.2d 494 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael H. Hinkle
See also United States v. Lumpkins, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 387 , 439 F.2d 494 (1970). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patricia Dent
See, e. g., United States v. Lumpkins, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 387 , 439 F.2d 494 (1970); Thomas v. United States, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 222, 224 , 419 F.2d 1203, 1205 (1969); United States v. Dixon, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 401, 403 , 419 F.2d 288, 290 (1969) (concurring opinion); Belton v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 201 , 382 F.2d 150 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shelby COLLINS
v.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, W. A. Boyle, Josephine Roche, C. W. Davis, Trustees, Appellants
v.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, W. A. Boyle, Josephine Roche, C. W. Davis, Trustees, Appellants
23234.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Aug 14, 1970.
Mr. Harold H. Bacon, Washington, D. C., for appellants; Messrs. Welly K. Hopkins and Joseph T. McFadden, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for appellants., Mr. Joseph H. Newlin, Arlington, Va., for appellee.
Wright, Leventhal, MacKinnon.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court ordering the appellant Fund to pay a pension to appellee Collins. Collins, like appellants in Roark et al. v. Boyle, 439 F.2d 497, decided today, had applied for a pension and been rejected on the ground that his last employment in the coal industry was not with a signatory employer. The District Court held this requirement invalid as being arbitrary and capricious. We affirm for the reasons set forth in our Roark opinion.
Affirmed.