Daniel Lee Jackson v. William Dobbs, 442 F.2d 928 (5th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Daniel Lee Jackson v. William Dobbs, 442 F.2d 928 (5th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sconiers v. Jarvis (ksd, 1978-07-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sconiers v. Jarvis
D. Kan. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Baker, 326 F.Supp. 787 (W.D.Mo.1970), aff’d, 442 F.2d 928 (8th Cir. 1971); Jehovah’s Witnesses in State of Washington v. King County Hospital Unit No. 1, 278 F.Supp. 488 (W.D.Wash. 1967) (three-judge court) aff’d, 390 U.S. 598 , 88 S.Ct. 1260 , 20 L.Ed.2d 158 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" Community Action Group, an Unincorporated Association v. City of Columbus, a Consolidated City-County (Muscogee) Government
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
The “possible unconstitutionality of a statute ‘on its face’ does not in itself justify an injunction against good-faith attempts to enforce it” absent “any showing of bad faith, harassment, or any other unusual circumstance that would call for equitable relief.” Younger v. Harris, 1971, 401 U.S. 37, 54 , 91 S.Ct. 746, 755 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 ; see Jackson v. Dobbs, 5 Cir. 1971, 442 F.2d 928 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Western Region v. City of Richmond
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jackson v. Dobbs, 329 F.Supp. 287 (N.D.Ga.1970), aff'd, 442 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.1971) (upholding ordinance requiring marchers to obtain a permit by 4:00 p.m. on the day preceding a march); York v. City of Danville, 207 Va. 665 , 152 S.E.2d 259 (1967) (striking down a 30-to 60-day advance notice requirement).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." N.A.A.C.P., Western Region v. City of Richmond
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jackson v. Dobbs, 329 F.Supp. 287 (N.D.Ga.1970), aff'd, 442 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.1971) (upholding ordinance requiring marchers to obtain a permit by 4:00 p.m. on the day preceding a march); York v. City of Danville, 207 Va. 665 , 152 S.E.2d 259 (1967) (striking down a 30- to 60-day advance notice requirement).
cited Cited "see, e.g." M. G. Thevis, Trading as Paris Book Stall v. Jamie Moore, in His Capacity as Chief, City of Birmingham Police Department, Birmingham, Alabama
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jackson v. Dobbs, 442 F.2d 928 (5th Cir. 1971); Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1971); Gornto v. Thomas, et al., 439 F.2d 1406 (5th Cir. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel Lee JACKSON Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
William DOBBS Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
30266.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 30, 1971.
442 F.2d 928
Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rinds-kopf, Atlanta, Ga., Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, New York City, for appellants., Lloyd Sutter, Atlanta, Ga., W. K. Campbell, Campbell & Campbell, Coving-ton, Ga., Gambrell, Russell, Moye & Kil-lorin, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.
Gewin, Coleman, Ainsworth.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rindskopf, Atlanta, Ga., Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, New York City, for appellants.

Lloyd Sutter, Atlanta, Ga., W. K. Campbell, Campbell & Campbell, Covington, Ga., Gambrell, Russell, Moye & Killorin, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case against certain city officials of Covington, Georgia, appellants attack an ordinance of the city regulating parades, demonstrations, assemblies and picketing, under which they were arrested, and sought a temporary and preliminary injunction. After a hearing the Court denied appellants’ motion for a temporary and preliminary injunction; the record before us does not indicate that the court dismissed the complaint.

We affirm the judgment of the district court denying injunctive relief and remand the case with direction to dismiss the complaint. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S.Ct. 758, 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S. Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.Ed.2d 781 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U. S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792 (1971). See also: Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1971); Gornto v. Thomas, et al., 439 F.2d- (5th Cir. 1971).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Rehearing

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and AINS-WORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.