Alex Cooley, Etc. v. William Baer Endictor, Assistant Solicitor of the Crim. Court of Fulton Cnty., 458 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Alex Cooley, Etc. v. William Baer Endictor, Assistant Solicitor of the Crim. Court of Fulton Cnty., 458 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sandra Lee Becker, Etc., Richard Guy Steffel v. John R. Thompson, Etc. (ca5, 1972-07-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sandra Lee Becker, Etc., Richard Guy Steffel v. John R. Thompson, Etc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
5th Cir. · 1972 · confidence medium
This presents a classic case for declaratory relief * *." Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullan, supra, 406 U.S. at 514 , 92 S.Ct. at 1759 (dissenting opinion by Powell, J.) 8 Compare Hobbs v. Thompson, supra, with Musick v. Jonsson, 5 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 201 and Cooley v. Endictor, 5 Cir., 1972, 458 F.2d 513 9 In two recent decisions involving circumstances virtually identical to those present here, the Supreme Court considered the merits of the constitutional claims without even mentioning the Younger doctrine.
cited Cited "see" Peoples Nat. Bank of Washington v. United States
W.D. Wash. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. First Nat’l Bank of Arizona, 458 F.2d 513 (9th Cir.1972), aff’g 348 F.Supp. 388 (D.Az.1970).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Trans-World Bank
C.D. Cal. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. First National Bank of Arizona, 348 F.Supp. 388 (D.Ariz., 1970), affirmed per curiam, 458 F.2d 513 (9th Cir. 1972), and United States v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. of New *1105 York, 360 F.Supp. 917 (S.D.N.Y., 1973), affirmed in part and reversed in part, 494 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1974). 3.
discussed Cited "see" Robert Alan Jones, Individually, Etc. v. Henry Wade, Individually, Etc., and Frank Dyson, Individually, Etc. (2×)
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See further, Cooley v. Endictor, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 513 ; thevis v. Moore, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1350 2 See the majority opinion pages 11-13, printed copy 3 In addition to Younger v. Harris, 1971, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 , and Samuels v. Mackell, 1971, 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 , discussed at length by the majority opinion in Becker v. Thompson, see specifically further Boyle v. Landry, 1971, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696 , reversing a three-judge district court's injunction against both pending and anticipated prosecutions in the Illinois…
cited Cited "see" Kent Milner D/B/A Belvedere Driving School v. Colonel R. H. Burson, Director of the Georgia Department Public Safety
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cooley v. Endicator, 458 F.2d 513 (5th Cir., 1972). 5 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Peoples National Bank of Washington, a National Banking Association v. United States
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Citizens & Southern National Bank, 538 F.2d 1101, 1107 (5th Cir.1976) (Georgia law), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); United States v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. of New York, 494 F.2d 919, 922 (2d Cir.1974) (New York law); United States v. Trans-World Bank, 382 F.Supp. 1100, 1104 (C.D.Cal.1974) (California law); see also United States v. First National Bank of Arizona, 348 F.Supp. 388, 389 (D.Ariz.1970), aff’d, 458 F.2d 513 (9th Cir.1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alex COOLEY Et Al., Etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
William Baer ENDICTOR, Assistant Solicitor of the Criminal Court of Fulton County, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
71-3207.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 22, 1972.
458 F.2d 513
Morris Brown, Charles Morgan, Jr., Norman Siegel, Emily Carssow, Neil Bradley, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants., Thomas E. Moran, Thomas R. Moran, Hinson McAuliffe, Sol. Gen., Criminal Court of Fulton County, Atlanta, Ga., Ralph H. Witt, Henry L. Bowden, Atlanta, Ga., William Baer Endictor, Asst. Sol. Gen., Criminal Court of Fulton County, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-ap-pellees.
Bell, Simpson, Morgan.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

Morris Brown, Charles Morgan, Jr., Norman Siegel, Emily Carssow, Neil Bradley, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Thomas E. Moran, Thomas R. Moran, Hinson McAuliffe, Sol. Gen., Criminal Court of Fulton County, Atlanta, Ga., Ralph H. Witt, Henry L. Bowden, Atlanta, Ga., William Baer Endictor, Asst. Sol. Gen., Criminal Court of Fulton County, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before BELL, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court denied both injunctive and declaratory relief against claimed threatened state court prosecution[1] of the producer and two female performers of a theatrical production “Stomp”.[2] A fourth plaintiff was joined as a member of the theatre-going public.

The trial court entered full findings of fact and conclusions of law, basing its holding primarily upon Boyle v. Landry, 1971, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S.Ct. 758, 27 L.Ed.2d 696, and the other cases composing the Younger v. Harris, 1971, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669, double trilogy of February 23, 1971.

Appellants have not demonstrated error in the proceedings below.

The judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

1

Under Georgia’s indecent exposure statute, Ga.Code Ann. Sec. 26-2105; Ga.L. 1971, page 344.

2

The opinion and order of the district court are reported as Cooley et al. v. Endictor et al., N.D.Ga.1971, 340 F.Supp. 15.

Rehearing

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Bane is denied.