United States v. Morris Thomas, 479 F.2d 1326 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
United States v. Morris Thomas, 479 F.2d 1326 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Morris THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant
73-1516.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 24, 1973.
479 F.2d 1326
Neil L. Heimanson, Atlanta, Ga. (court-appointed), for defendant-appellant., John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., P. Bruce Kirwan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Brown, Dyer, Simpson.
Published
PER CURIAM:

In compliance with the mandate set forth in Anders v.. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully reviewed this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Neil L. Heimanson, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. King, 5th Cir. 1972, 456 F.2d 1243; United States v. Mills, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1397; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.