green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bankers Trust Co. of Western New York v. Crawford
Bank, 372 F.Supp. 1027,1035 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff’d, 510 F.2d 969, 970 (3d Cir.1975)) and attorney’s fees (see Murphy v. Travelers Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Eckell v. Borbidge
See Beilis v. Thai, 373 F.Supp. 120 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff'd mem. 510 F.2d 969 (3rd Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graves v. James (In Re James)
See Bellis v. Thal, 373 F.Supp. 120 (E.D.Pa.1974) aff'd. mem. 510 F.2d 969 (3rd Cir.1975) (corporate officer is a fiduciary who has burden to establish good faith of insider transactions to his benefit).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eckel v. Borbidge (In Re Borbidge)
See Bellis v. Thal, 373 F.Supp. 120 (E.D.Pa.1974) aff'd mem. 510 F.2d 969 (3rd Cir.1975) (corporate officer is a fiduciary who has burden to establish good faith of insider transactions to his benefits).
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers v. North Bend Terminal Co.
See International Union of United Brewery Workers v. Duke & Co., 373 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa.1974), aff'd mem., 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers Of America v. North Bend Terminal Co.
See International Union of United Brewery Workers v. Duke & Co., 373 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa.1974), aff'd mem., 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Realty Investments Associates, L.P.
See Delaware Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 62 F.R.D. 353 , 355 n.6 (D.Del.1974), aff’d, 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Baughman v. Bradford Coal Co.
See dicta in Delaware Citizens For Clean Air, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 367 F.Supp. 1040, 1047 (D.Del.) aff’d 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Village of Kaktovik v. Watt
See also Metropolitan Washington Coalition for Clean Air v. District of Columbia, 639 F.2d 802 , 804 (D.C.Cir.1981). . 672 F.2d at 39 (emphasis added). . 62 F.R.D. 353, 355 (D.Del.1974), aff’d mem., 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975). . 672 F.2d at 36 n.4. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1982
See also Metropolitan Washington Coalition for Clean Air v. District of Columbia, 639 F.2d 802 , 804 (D.C.Cir.1981) 45 672 F.2d at 39 (emphasis added) 46 62 F.R.D. 353, 355 (D.Del.1974), aff'd mem., 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975) 47 672 F.2d at 36 n.4 48 Brief for Appellees North Slope Borough, et al., at 53-61.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers Of America v. American Smelting And Refining Company
See also International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink, and Distillery Workers of America v. Duke and Company, Inc., 373 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd, 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975) (rights and duties of parties arising out of employment relationship are strictly controlled by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement and duty to continue pension plan does not survive plant's closing); Baker v. Fleet Maintenance Inc., 409 F.2d 551, 554 (7th Cir. 1969) (when collective bargaining agreement has expired by its terms, it will not support claims for post-expiration wrongful dis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers of America v. American Smelting and Refining Co.
See also International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink, and Distillery Workers of America v. Duke and Company, Inc., 373 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa.), aff’d, 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975) (rights and duties of parties arising out of employment relationship are strictly controlled by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement and duty to continue pension plan does not survive plant’s closing); Baker v. Fleet Maintenance Inc., 409 F.2d 551, 554 (7th Cir. 1969) (when collective bargaining agreement has expired by its terms, it will not support claims for post-expiration wrongful…
Bellis
v.
Thal
v.
Thal
74-1562.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 23, 1975.
510 F.2d 969
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Bellis
v.
Thal
74-1562
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit
1/23/75
E.D.Pa., 373 F.Supp. 120
AFFIRMED