green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Larry and Lynda Hutchings v. Beneficial Finance Company of Oregon
Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 519 F.2d 447, 447 (4th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Walters v. First State Bank
See Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 399 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Va.1974), aff'd 519 F.2d 447 (4th Cir.1975); Riggs v. Government Emp.
cited
Cited "see"
Compton v. Altavista Motors, Inc.
See Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 399 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Va.1974), aff'd 519 F.2d 447 (4th Cir.1975); Riggs v. Government Emp.
cited
Cited "see"
Terry v. Whitlock
See Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 399 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Va.1974) aff'd 519 F.2d 447 (4th Cir.1975); Riggs v. Government Emp.
cited
Cited "see"
Polk v. Crown Auto, Inc.
See Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 399 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Va.1974) aff'd 519 F.2d 447 (4th Cir.1975); Riggs v. Government Emp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Melvin McGowan v. King, Incorporated
Since this single violation is sufficient to impose the § 1640(a) liability, Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc., 411 U.S. 356 , 376 n. 41, 93 S.Ct. 1652, 1664 , 36 L.Ed.2d 318 (1973); see Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 519 F.2d 447 (4th Cir. 1975), we need not and do not consider the remaining contentions.. 12 C.F.R. § 226.6 (a) mandates that “The disclosures required to be given by this part shall be made ... in the terminology prescribed in applicable sections.” In this credit sale transaction, 12 C.F.R. § 226.8 (c)(8)(ii) requires disclosure of the sum of the cash price, …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
BIC Financial Services, Inc. v. Green (In re Green)
See also Walker v. College Toyota, Inc., 519 F.2d 447 (4th Cir.1975) (failure to disclose “deferred payment price”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shelia C. WALKER, Appellee,
v.
COLLEGE TOYOTA, INC., Appellant
v.
COLLEGE TOYOTA, INC., Appellant
75-1181.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jul 18, 1975.
Robert C. Wood, III, Lynchburg, Va. (Kenneth S. White, Edmunds, Williams, Robertson, Sackett, Baldwin & Graves, Lynchburg, Va.), for appellant., Charles M. L. Mangum, Lynchburg, Va., for appellee.
Craven, Butzner, Field.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM:
College Toyota, Inc., appeals from an adverse judgment in the district court holding it civilly liable for a violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq., and its accompanying regulations, in the case, 12 C.F.R. § 226.-8(c)(8)(ii).
The facts in the case were stipulated, and neither party contests that the regulation, which requires disclosure of the “deferred payment price,” was violated. The sole question is whether the violation of that regulation subjects the creditor to civil liability.
For the reasons stated by the district court, which relied on Mourning v. Family Publications Services, Inc., 411 U.S. 356, 93 S.Ct. 1652, 36.L.Ed.2d 318 (1973), the judgment of the district court is affirmed.