green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Scottish Insurance Company v. United States of America, Kathleen M. Fleming v. United States of America, Simone C. Weaver v. United States of America, John William Dowdle, Jr. v. United States of America, Maxine Cearley v. United States
See also Maffei v. Nieves-Reta, 412 F.Supp. 43, 44 (S.D.Cal.1976) ("proceeding under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the duty inquiry concerns the legal responsibilities imposed by state law upon its private citizens"), Aff'd mem., 549 F.2d 807 (9th Cir. 1977). 3 23 An important policy underlies these holdings that a federal statutory duty does not automatically give rise to a duty of care to which a state's negligence per se doctrine would be applied.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Scottish Insurance v. United States
See also Maffei v. Nieves-Reta, 412 F.Supp. 43, 44 (S.D.Cal.1976) (“proceeding under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the duty inquiry concerns the legal responsibilities imposed by state law upon its private citizens”), aff’d mem., 549 F.2d 807 (9th Cir. 1977). 3 An important policy underlies these holdings that a federal statutory duty does not automatically give rise to a duty of care to which a state’s negligence per se doctrine would be applied.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meredith
v.
State of Arizona
v.
State of Arizona
76-2999.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 19, 1977.
549 F.2d 807
Published
Meredith
v.
State of Arizona
No. 76-2999
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
1/19/77
1
D.Ariz.
APPEAL DISMISSED