The Bohack Corp. v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, 567 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
The Bohack Corp. v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, 567 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an order granting or denying consolidation is a nonappealable interlocutory order”
65 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Darrell Hubbard v. (ca3, 2025-06-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Darrell Hubbard v.
3rd Cir. · 2025 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an order granting or denying consolidation is a nonappealable interlocutory order
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Central National Bank & Trust Co. (2×)
8th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
The district court subsequently entered an order in the first case granting judgment for the de fendants on one claim and dismissing the other claims “without prejudice pending final decision in the related case * * Brace, 567 F.2d at 241 (emphasis original).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Central National Bank & Trust Company v. Kenneth Holmquist and Dorothy Holmquist. The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Central National Bank & Trust Company v. Kenneth Holmquist and Dorothy Holmquist. The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Central National Bank & Trust Company v. Kenneth Holmquist and Dorothy Holmquist, Brenton National Bank of Des Moines, Intervenor-Appellant (2×)
8th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
The district court subsequently entered an order in the first case granting judgment for the defendants on one claim and dismissing the other claims "without prejudice pending final decision in the related case * * *." Brace, 567 F.2d at 241 (emphasis original).
discussed Cited "see" Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Task Management Inc
3rd Cir. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brace v. O’Neill, 567 F.2d 237 , 240 n.9 (3d Cir. 1977) (explaining that generally, “[a]n order granting or denying consolidation is a nonappealable interlocutory order”); see also United States v. Chelsea Towers, Inc., 404 F.2d 329, 330 (3d Cir. 1968) (per curiam). 4 the public interest.” Issa v. Sch.
cited Cited "see" Trent v. Dial Medical of Florida, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brace v. O’Neill, 567 F.2d 237 (3d Cir.1977). *221 Therefore, the proper jurisdictional inquiry focusses on an interpretation of Moses H.
cited Cited "see" Earl Trent, and All Those Similarly Situated Edwin Snead, of the Estate of Elaine Snead Intervenor-Plaintiff in D.C. Edwin Snead, in His Own Right Intervenor-Plaintiff in D.C. v. Dial Medical of Florida, Inc. Community Dialysis Centers v. W.W. Grainger, Inc. American MacHine and Tool Co. Inc. Of Pennsylvania, A/K/A American MacHine and Tool Co., Inc. Baxter Healthcare Corporation Earl Trent
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brace v. O'Neill, 567 F.2d 237 (3d Cir.1977).
cited Cited "see" Hovsons, Inc. v. Secretary of Interior of United States
3rd Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brace v. O’Neill, 567 F.2d 237 (3d Cir.1977); Cotler v. Inter-County Orthopaedic Ass’n, P.A., 526 F.2d 537 (3d Cir.1975); Amy v. Philadelphia Transport Company, 266 F.2d 869 (3d Cir.1959).
cited Cited "see" Hovsons, Inc. v. Secretary of Interior of United States
3rd Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brace v. O'Neill, 567 F.2d 237 (3d Cir.1977); Cotler v. Inter-County Orthopaedic Ass'n, P.A., 526 F.2d 537 (3d Cir.1975); Arny v. Philadelphia Transport Company, 266 F.2d 869 (3d Cir.1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The Bohack Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant
v.
Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees
440.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 14, 1977.
567 F.2d 237
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

567 F.2d 237

97 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2275, 82 Lab.Cas. P 10,259

The BOHACK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant,
v.
TRUCK DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO. 807, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD
OF TEAMSTERS, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

Nos. 306, 440, Dockets 77-5013, 77-5014.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 1, 1977.
Decided Dec. 14, 1977.

J. Warren Mangan, Long Island City, N. Y. (O'Connor, Quinlan & Mangan, P. C., Long Island City, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellant-appellee Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807.

Jesse I. Levine, New York City (Shaw & Levine, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee-appellant.

Before MOORE and GURFEIN, Circuit Judges, and BONSAL, District Judge.[*]

PER CURIAM:

[*~237]1

The matter is before us again on appeal from orders of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Chief Judge Mishler) entered after the remand of this Court on the earlier appeal reported in 541 F.2d 312 (1976).

[*~251]2

We affirm on the opinion of Chief Judge Mishler below, 431 F.Supp. 646, issued on appeals from orders of Bankruptcy Judge Parente.

*

Hon. Dudley B. Bonsal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation