25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1735, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. Falcon, Cross-Appellant v. Gen. Tel. Co. of the Sw., Cross-Appellee, 647 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1735, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. Falcon, Cross-Appellant v. Gen. Tel. Co. of the Sw., Cross-Appellee, 647 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Falcon v. General Telephone Co. of Southwest (txnd, 1985-06-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Falcon v. General Telephone Co. of Southwest (2×)
N.D. Tex. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See 647 F.2d 633 ; 686 F.2d 261 . 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barbara A. McClure Cross-Appellant v. Mexia Independent School District, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Falcon v. General Telephone Company of the Southwest, 626 F.2d 369 , 383 n. 20 (5th Cir.1980), vacated on other grounds, 450 U.S. 1036 , 101 S.Ct. 1752 , 68 L.Ed.2d 234 (1981), on remand, 647 F.2d 633 (5th Cir.1981); Peters v. Jefferson Chemical Company, 516 F.2d 447, 450 (5th Cir.1975). 3 *400 In Dickerson v. Metropolitan Dade County, 659 F.2d 574, 579 (5th Cir.1981), a non-jury Title VII retaliation suit, we described Smith as holding “that the district court was obligated to admit into evidence the EEOC investigative report and findings because the probative value outweighed any …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1735, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. Falcon, Cross-Appellant
v.
General Telephone Company of the Southwest, Cross-Appellee
78-3587.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 24, 1981.
647 F.2d 633
Published

647 F.2d 633

25 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1735,
26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062
Mariano S. FALCON, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF the SOUTHWEST,
Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

No. 78-3587.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 29, 1981.
On Rehearing June 24, 1981.
Rehearing Denied June 23, 1981.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Sarah Tilghman Hughes, Judge.

E. Russell Nunnally, Dallas, Tex., Stephen W. Holt, San Angelo, Tex., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

John E. Collins, Irving, Tex., Frank P. Hernandez, Garland, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee cross-appellant.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

Before TUTTLE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:

The judgment of this Court in this case having been vacated by the Supreme Court 101 S.Ct. 1752, and remanded for further consideration in light of Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. --, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d -- (1981), the case is now remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with Burdine.

The Court did not deal with that part of our prior judgment that decided or remanded non-Burdine issues for further consideration of the trial court. We, therefore, reinstate Parts IV and V of our original opinion.

REMANDED.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

1

It appearing that in our Order of May 29, 1981, we did not fully specify our non-Burdine issues, we now amend the last sentence of that Order to read as follows: We therefore, reinstate parts I, II, IV, V and VI of our original opinion.