green
Positive treatment
12.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Academy of Allergy & Asthma in Primary Care v. Amerigroup Tennessee, Inc.
See id. at 289–94; Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Nielsen Media Rsch., Inc., 711 F.3d 1264 , 1272–73 (11th Cir. 2013); In re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litig., 11 F.3d 1460 , 1464–66 (9th Cir. 1993); Huron Valley Hosp., Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cir. 1977)). “[I]n assessing the standing of would-be market entrants, courts assess the ‘intent and preparedness’ of the prospective entrant.” Steward Health Care Sys., LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island, 997 F. Supp. 2d 142, 158 (D.R.I. 2014) (quoting Huron Valley Hosp., Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.1981)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Wooster Industrial Park, LLC v. City of Wooster
Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bubis v. Blanton
Among the factors which courts have considered are the plaintiff's background and experience in the prospective business, financial ability to enter the business, substantial affirmative action toward entry, and the consummation of contracts in preparation for entry. 12 Id. at 1033 (citations omitted). 13 In Huron Valley, the plaintiffs, who were attempting to build a hospital, were denied a certificate of need by a state agency.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Practice Perfect, Inc. v. Hamilton County Pharmaceutical Assoc.
In determining whether the plaintiff has shown an injury in fact to its “business or property,” it is the Court’s task to “distinguish the serious potential competitor who has been illegally kept out of the market from the inchoate business enterprise with a mere hope of entry.” Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Central Telecommunications, Inc. v. Tci Cablevision, Inc., Community Telecommunications, Inc. And Telecommunications, Inc.
Parks v. Watson, 716 F.2d 646, 659-60 (9th Cir.1983); Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 694 F.2d 466, 475 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 103 S.Ct. 2430 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1983); Huron Valley Hospital Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.1981); Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 973 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980); Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc., 570 F.2d 982, 987-88 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 956 , 98 S.Ct. 3069 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1121 (1978); Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric, 152 F…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
See, e.g., Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 365 F.2d 629 (5th Cir.1966); Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.1981); Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., 415 F.Supp. 176,179-81 (E.D.Pa.1976); 2 Areeda & Turner, supra, § 335c at 174-75.
cited
Cited "see"
Heath v. Micropatent, No. Cv97 401481 (Dec. 30, 1999)
See Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029 , 1033 (6th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin R. Wunder
See United States v. Mundt, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir.1981); United States v. Evanko, 604 F.2d 21, 23 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 685 , 62 L.Ed.2d 657 (1980), citing United States v. Jordan, 508 F.2d 750, 752 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 842 , 96 S.Ct. 76 , 46 L.Ed.2d 62 (1975); United States v. Daly, 481 F.2d 28, 29 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1064 , 94 S.Ct. 571 , 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City Of Pontiac
See Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 466 F.Supp. 1301 (E.D.Mich.1979), vacated, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir.1981), later proceeding, 585 F.Supp. 1159 (E.D.Mich.1984), later proceeding, 612 F.Supp. 654 (E.D.Mich.1985), aff'd, 792 F.2d 563 (6th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac
See Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 466 F.Supp. 1301 (E.D.Mich.1979), vacated, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir.1981), later proceeding, 585 F.Supp. 1159 (E.D.Mich.1984), later proceeding, 612 F.Supp. 654 (E.D.Mich.1985), aff'd, 792 F.2d 563 (6th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Huron Valley Hospital, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. City of Pontiac, Cross-Appellants
See Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, et al., 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Hospital v. Thornburgh
See Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 466 F.Supp. 1301 (E.D.Mich.1979), vacated on other grounds, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven T. Heise
See United States v. Mundt, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir.1981); United States v. Evanko, 604 F.2d 21, 23 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 685 , 62 L.Ed.2d 657 (1980), citing United States v. Jordan, 508 F.2d 750, 752 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 842 , 96 S.Ct. 76 , 46 L.Ed.2d 62 (1975); United States v. Daly, 481 F.2d 28, 29 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1064 , 94 S.Ct. 571 , 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
White & White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology v. Blue Cross, 452 U.S. 378 , 101 S.Ct. 2415 , 69 L.Ed.2d 89 (1981); accord, see, Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steward Health Care System, LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
See, e.g., Huron Valley Hosp., Inc. v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.1981) (plaintiffs acquisition of land for hospital, performance of feasibility studies, attempts to obtain government approvals, and consummation of contracts were sufficient to establish standing); see also Shionogi Pharma, Inc. v. Mylan, Inc., No. 10-1077, 2011 WL 3860680 , at *3-6, 2011 U.S. Dist.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
See, e.g., Huron Valley Hospital v. City of Pontiac, 666 F.2d 1029 (6th Cir.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Schubert E. MUNDT, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Schubert E. MUNDT, Defendant-Appellant
80-1719.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 7, 1981.
Richard Durant, Durant & Durant, Detroit, Mich., for defendant-appellant., James K. Robinson, U. S. Atty., Samuel C. Damren, Asst. U. S. Atty., David L. Maurer, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appel-. lee.
Lively, Merritt, Kennedy.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
ORDER
The defendant Mundt appeals from his jury conviction on three counts of violating 26 U.S.C. § 7203, willful failure to file a federal income tax return. Though he had filed returns as required by law in previous years, the defendant filed “protest” tax returns for the years 1972, 1973 and 1974. These returns disclosed none of the information with respect to defendant’s income for the years required by law, but contained notations and attachments which claimed that his constitutional rights would be violated if he were required to disclose the information called for by the applicable laws.
Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel together with the record on appeal this court concludes that no errors prejudicial to the rights of the defendant occurred during the district court proceedings. The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Evanko, 604 F.2d 21 (6th Cir. 1979).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.