green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Nucal Foods, Inc. v. Quality Egg LLC
See United States v. Healthwin-Midtown Convalescent Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Inc., 511 F.Supp. 416, 418-19 (C.D.Cal.1981), aff'd, 685 F.2d 448 (9th Cir. 1982); see also Wells Fargo & Co., 556 F.2d at 425 .
cited
Cited "see"
Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst v. Louisiana Hydrolec John W. Marmoulides, and Samuel W. Ethridge Aqualec, Inc., Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant v. Aqualec, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. Samuel W. Ethridge, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Healthwin-Midtown Convalescent Hospital and Rehabilitation Center Inc., 511 F.Supp. 416, 420 (C.D.Cal.1981), aff'd, 685 F.2d 448 (9th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst v. Louisiana Hydrolec
See United States v. Healthwin-Midtown Convalescent Hospital and Rehabilitation Center Inc., 511 F.Supp. 416, 420 (C.D.Cal.1981), aff 'd, 685 F.2d 448 (9th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ado Finance, AG v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
Id. at 15-16; see also United States v. Healthwin Midtown Conva *717 lescent Hosp., 511 F.Supp. 416 , 418 affirmed 685 F.2d 448 (9th Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Espinoza-Espinoza
v.
Espinoza-Espinoza
82-1015.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 14, 1982.
Published
U. S.
v.
Espinoza-Espinoza
82-1015
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit
6/14/82
1
E.D.Wash.
AFFIRMED