green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Schmitz v. Smentowski
See id.; Restatement (Second) of Torts § 870 comment c (1977); but see Rodgers v. Grow-Kiewit Corp.-Mk., 535 F.Supp. 814, 816 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd 714 F.2d 116 (2d Cir.1982) (“[M]otives of profit, economic self-interest or business advantage are by their terms not malicious, and their presence, even if mixed with malice or personal animus, bars recovery under prima facie tort.”) We believe that to allow a defendant to escape liability solely because he can demonstrate some economic benefit to himself from the complained of act would defeat the policy behind our recognition of prima facie tor…
cited
Cited "see"
Frutico, S.A. de C.V. v. Bankers Trust Co.
See Rodgers v. Grow-Kiewit Corp.-MK, 535 F.Supp. 814, 816 , aff'd without op., 714 F.2d 116 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carfora v. City of New York
See Neale v. Dillon, 534 F.Supp. 1381, 1390 (E.D.N.Y.1982) (“A claim of constructive discharge must be supported by more than the employee’s subjective opinion that his or her position has become so intolerable and difficult that he or she must resign.”), affirmed, 714 F.2d 116 (2d Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Sbrocco v. Pacific Fruit, Inc.
See Rodgers v. Grow-Kiewit Corp. MK, 535 F.Supp. 814, 816 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff’d, 714 F.2d 116 (2d Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodgers
v.
Grow-Kiewit Corp
v.
Grow-Kiewit Corp
82-7223.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 8, 1982.
714 F.2d 116
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Rodgers
v.
Grow-Kiewit Corp.
82-7223
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
10/8/82
S.D.N.Y., 535 F.Supp. 814
AFFIRMED