green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John B. Castle
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 1171 (footnote omitted). 3 33 Likewise, the federal district court in FDIC v. Webb, 464 F.Supp. 520 (E.D.Tenn.1978), rejected the obligor's assertion that the notes had been executed in blank and completed in an unauthorized manner.
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Arcadia Marine, Inc.
See FDIC v. Powers, 576 F.Supp. 1167, 1169 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff’d mem., 753 F.2d 1076 (7th Cir.1984); 12 U.S.C. § 1823 (e).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. MM & S PARTNERS
See FDIC v. Powers, 576 F.Supp. 1167, 1171 , 1172 n. 2, aff'd mem., 753 F.2d 1076 (7th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Two Rivers Associates, Inc.
The Court stated that “[neither the FDIC nor the state banking authorities would be able to make a reliable evaluation if bank records contained seemingly unqualified notes that are in fact subject to undisclosed conditions.” 484 U.S. at 91-92 , 108 S.Ct. at 401 ; Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); see also FDIC v. Castle, 781 F.2d 1101, 1108 (5th Cir.1986) (quoting FDIC v. Powers, 576 F.Supp. 1167 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff 'd, 753 F.2d 1076 (7th Cir.1984)). 12 If however, the records of a bank evidence all the obligat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Two Rivers Associates, Inc.
The Court stated that "[n]either the FDIC nor the state banking authorities would be able to make a reliable evaluation if bank records contained seemingly unqualified notes that are in fact subject to undisclosed conditions." 484 U.S. at 91-92 , 108 S.Ct. at 401 ; Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); see also FDIC v. Castle, 781 F.2d 1101, 1108 (5th Cir.1986) (quoting FDIC v. Powers, 576 F.Supp. 1167 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff'd, 753 F.2d 1076 (7th Cir.1984)). 12 If however, the records of a bank evidence all the obligations…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Dixon
Rather, the P.L.M. court characterized this argument as “an impermissible attempt to limit the reach of section 1823(e).” Id.; see also FDIC v. Powers, 576 F.Supp. 1167, 1169 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff'd without opinion, 753 F.2d 1076 (7th Cir.1984) (holding that “facially sufficient written guarantees [must] be considered assets under § 1823(e).”); cf. FDIC v. Van Laanen, 769 F.2d 666, 666-67 (10th Cir.1985) (holding that obligor “was estopped from denying liability on [his] assumption agreement” in action by “FDIC, as receiver for Penn Square Bank.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris, Appeal Of
16-2106.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Dec 4, 1984.
753 F.2d 1076
Published
Harris, Appeal of
83-2847
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
12/4/84
1
W.DWis.
AFFIRMED