Miami Ctr. Ltd. P'ship, Miami Ctr. Corp., Theodore B. Gould, Chopin Assocs., & Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New York, Miami Ctr. Corp. & Chopin Assocs. v. The Bank of New York, 826 F.2d 1010 (11th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Miami Ctr. Ltd. P'ship, Miami Ctr. Corp., Theodore B. Gould, Chopin Assocs., & Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New York, Miami Ctr. Corp. & Chopin Assocs. v. The Bank of New York, 826 F.2d 1010 (11th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miami Center Limited Partnership, Miami Center Corporation, Theodore B. Gould, Chopin Associates, and Holywell Corporation
v.
Bank of New York, Miami Center Corporation and Chopin Associates v. The Bank of New York
86-5286.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 8, 1987.
826 F.2d 1010
Published

826 F.2d 1010

MIAMI CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Miami Center Corporation,
Theodore B. Gould, Chopin Associates, and Holywell
Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee.
MIAMI CENTER CORPORATION and Chopin Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The BANK OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 86-5286, 86-5386.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1987.

Williams & Connolly, Philip J. Ward, Raymond W. Bergan, Washington, D.C., Fred H. Kent, Jr., Kent, Watts & Durden, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

S. Harvey Ziegler, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Vance E. Salter, Coll Davidson Carter Smith Salter, & Barkett, P.A., Miami, Fla., Thomas F. Noone, Emmet, Marvin & Martin, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Irving M. Wolff, Holland & Knight, Miami, Fla., for Smith.

Vance E. Salter, Coll Davidson Carter Smith Salter & Barkett, P.A., Miami, Fla., for Bank of New York.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.

Before GODBOLD and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and SWYGERT[*], Senior Circuit Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion June 29, 1987, 11 Cir., 820 F.2d 376).

PER CURIAM:

1

Petitioners are correct that neither the bankruptcy court nor the district court made an express or implied finding that the project was sold to a good faith purchaser, and in this respect the opinion of the court is corrected. This does not affect our conclusion because debtors do not challenge the sale of the project or seek reconveyance of the project.

2

In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

*

Honorable Luther M. Swygert, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation