Morris May v. Chester J. Gray Harold Ferguson, 833 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Morris May v. Chester J. Gray Harold Ferguson, 833 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ramirez-De Leon v. Mujica-Cotto (prd, 2004-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ramirez-De Leon v. Mujica-Cotto
D.P.R. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Germano v. City of Mayfield Heights, 648 F.Supp. 984, 985 (N.D.Ohio 1986), aff'd 833 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir.1987) (property right in sick leave and clothing allowance deemed insignificant, therefore, no pretermination hearing required as long as there exist postdeprivation procedures under state law); Pitts v. Bd. of Educ. of U.S.D. 305, 869 F.2d 555, 556 (10th Cir.1989) (a two-day suspension with pay does not deprive an employee of any “measurable property interest”); Sewell v. Jefferson County Fiscal Court, 863 F.2d 461, 467 (6th Cir.1988) (no due process violation where the plaintiff wa…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert T. Ewing v. National Labor Relations Board, Herbert F. Darling, Inc., Intervenor
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Every Woman’s Place, Inc., 282 NLRB No. 48 (Dec. 11, 1986), enf'd, Every Woman’s Place v. NLRB, 833 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir.1987) (unpublished decision available on WESTLAW); Consumers Power Co., 282 N.L.R.B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris May
v.
Chester J. Gray Harold Ferguson
87-3697.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Nov 18, 1987.
833 F.2d 1012
Unpublished

833 F.2d 1012

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Morris MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Chester J. GRAY; Harold Ferguson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3697.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 18, 1987.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

The plaintiff moves for pauper status and to amend his complaint on appeal from the district court's order returning his civil rights complaint unfiled. This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the plaintiff's brief, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

The plaintiff is a prolific litigant. On April 16, 1987, the district court entered an order requiring the plaintiff to accompany his complaints with a certification that the issues are based on new facts and are not meant to harass the defendants. When the plaintiff attempted to file the present complaint, he did not accompany it with the documents ordered by the district court. On June 26, 1987, the court entered an order returning the complaint unfiled.

3

We hold that the district court's order of April 16, 1987, is valid. Abdullah v. Gatto, 773 F.2d 487, 488 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam); In re Green, 669 F.2d 779, 787 (D.C.Cir.1981) (per curiam). Because the plaintiff did not comply with this order when he attempted to file his complaint, we hold that the June 26, 1987 order is also valid. Finally, we hold that it would not be appropriate for this court to address the motion to amend the complaint.

4

The motions for pauper status and to amend the complaint are denied. The appeal is dismissed because it is frivolous and entirely without merit. Rule 9(b)(4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.