Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 861 F.2d 1194 (9th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 861 F.2d 1194 (9th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. Bowling (oknd, 2025-02-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Smith v. Bowling
N.D. Okla. · 2025 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196-97 (10th Cir. 1988) (finding private corporation that managed hospital liable as state actor because liability ran with delegation of authority).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Davis v. United States Department of Justice
D. Kan. · 2023 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196 (10th Cir. 1988) (citing Burton v. Wilmington Parking Auth., 365 U.S. 715 , 723–24 (1961)). 101 Beedle v. Wilson, 422 F.3d 1059, 1073 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting Sooner Prods.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Buchanan v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC
E.D. Okla. · 2022 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196-97 (10th Cir. 1988) (finding private corporation that managed hospital liable as state actor because liability ran with delegation of authority). 44 Dr. Cooper and Nurse McCullar are named Defendants with full summary judgment briefing regarding each of them.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Barnett v. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable
10th Cir. · 2020 · confidence medium
That test has rarely been applied, see Gallagher, 49 F.3d at 1451, and has been limited to substantial, intimate long-term relationships, see Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715, 725 (1961) (public parking authority that leased space to segregated restaurant on which the parking facility was financially dependent had “so far insinuated itself into a position of interdependence with [the restaurant] that it must be recognized as a joint participant in the [racially discriminatory] activity”); Milo v. 9 Cushing Municipal Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196 (10th Cir. 1988) (city “s…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Chudacoff v. UNIV. MED. CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
9th Cir. · 2011 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1197 (10th Cir.1988) ("The defendants cannot escape liability by delegating responsibility to another party." (internal citations omitted)); Jatoi v. Hurst-Euless-Bedford Hosp.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Beedle v. Wilson
10th Cir. · 2005 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196-97 (10th Cir.1988); Tarabishi I, 827 F.2d at 652.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) No. 01-5098
10th Cir. · 2003 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196-97 (10th Cir.1988) (finding private corporation which managed hospital liable as a state actor because liability ran with delegation of authority); DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., 844 F.2d 714, 720-23 (10th Cir.1988) (holding that private party acting in accordance with duties imposed by government contract, when sued solely on basis of those acts dictated by government, is implicitly subject to liability but able to raise qualified immunity defense). 14 We note, also, that evidence in the record points to similar examinations performed pursuant to …
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.
10th Cir. · 2003 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196-97 (10th Cir.1988) (finding private corporation which managed hospital liable as a state actor because liability ran with delegation of authority); DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., 844 F.2d 714, 720-23 (10th Cir.1988) (holding that private party acting in accordance with duties imposed by government contract, when sued solely on basis of those acts dictated by government, is implicitly subject to liability but able to raise qualified immunity defense). 14 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mealand v. Eastern New Mexico Medical Center (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2001 · confidence medium
Hosp., 861 F.2d 1194, 1196 (10th Cir.1988); see also LebrOn v. Nat’l R.R.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom Concert
unknown court · 1995 · confidence medium
Id. at 1196.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Moore v. Wyoming Medical Center (4×)
D. Wyo. · 1993 · confidence medium
A careful reading of both the Fifth and Tenth • Circuit case law regarding the “public function” test leads this Court to consider the following three factors in deciding whether Wyoming Medical Center is a state actor: (1) whether the County receives a “direct financial benefit” from the private lessee, Wyoming Medical Center; (2) whether the County “benefitted” from the actual complained of violation(s); (3) whether the County retained “control [of] and responsibility” for the hospital; Albright, 884 F.2d at 839-41; Milo, 861 F.2d at 1196-97.
cited Cited "see" Wasatch Equality v. Alta Ski Lifts Co.
10th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See 861 F.2d at 1196-97 .
examined Cited "see" Walker v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, REGIONAL TRANSP. (4×)
D. Colo. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milo, 861 F.2d at 1195 .
discussed Cited "see" Nicholas v. North Colorado Medical Center, Inc.
Colo. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milo v. Cushing Municipal Hospital, 861 F.2d 1194 (10th Cir.1988) (holding that a private corporation was a public hospital for purposes of § 1983 liability); Jatoi v. Hurst-Euless-Bedford Hospital Authority, 807 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1987) (concluding that hospital was a state actor because the public entity that owned it retained control of and responsibility for the hospital).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
87-4167.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 2, 1988.
861 F.2d 1194
Nelson, Boochever, Brunetti.
Published

This case is withdrawn from submission pending disposition by the Supreme Court of Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Railway Labor Executives’ Ass’n No. 88-1. See — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 52, 102 L.Ed.2d 31 (1988) (certiorari granted to review Third Circuit’s decision, published at 845 F.2d 1187 (3d Cir.1988)).