green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
51.1 score
“generally speaking, a party may not raise an argument for the first time in a petition for rehearing.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro
generally speaking, a party may not raise an argument for the first time in a petition for rehearing.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Joshua Folks v. Jeff Landry et al.
Sep. 15, 2025) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 18 Rec.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Yaseen Saeed v. Bassam Saeed, Ali Kassim, Hair Galleria, Almuntasir Saleh, Husam Nasher, Yahya Qahtan, Fadhle Mohsen, Haithuem Shaibi, Riyad Shaibi, Ali Albussaisi, Saleh Ayed Saeed, Adnan Obaid, and Taha Aloqai
Apr. 5, 2010) (quoting Templet v. HydroChem Inc., 367 F.3d 473 , 478–79 (5th Cir. 2004)). 14 See Waltman v. Int’l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989). 15 Helena Labs. v. Alpha Scientific Corp., 483 F. Supp. 2d 538, 539 (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). were due.16 Plaintiff is correct that because Qahtan was served with the Complaint on November 20, 2025, responsive pleadings were due on December 11, 2025.17 However, a Rule 12(b)(1) motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction “may be raised by a party, or by a court on its own initiative, at any …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Raymond Flanks v. City of New Orleans, ET AL.
Apr. 5, 2010) (quoting Templet v. HydroChem Inc., 367 F.3d 473 , 478–79 (5th Cir. 2004)). 8 See Waltman v. Int’l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989). 9 Helena Labs. v. Alpha Scientific Corp., 483 F. Supp. 2d 538, 539 (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 10 Henderson v. Turner, No. CIV.A. 11-39, 2012 WL 3109481 , at *2 (M.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Porter v. Roberts
Feb. 3, 1998)). 5 Waltman v. Int’l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989) (internal quotation and citation omitted). 6 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 7 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 8 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 481 . 9 Amendment under Rule 15 “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” See, e.g., Gibson v. Ocean Shipholdings, Inc., No. 15-0662, 2015 WL 4645663 , at *2 (E.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jurisich Oysters, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Ill. 1982), aff’d, 735 F.2d 1367 (7th Cir. 1984)). 9 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 10 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). other than mere disagreement with a prior order, reconsideration is a waste of judicial time and resources and should not be granted.11 Movants argue that reconsideration is appropriate because (1) the court denied intervention based on an improperly applied heightened standard inapplicable to this case and (2) new evidence bolsters movants’ position that their interests diverge from the Defendants.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Godfrey v. First Student
Ill. 1982), aff’d, 735 F.2d 1367 (7th Cir. 1984)). 12 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 13 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 14 Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 481 . to correct a manifest error of law or fact, present newly discovered or previously unavailable evidence, or argue that an intervening change in the law warrants reconsideration.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hospital Service District No. 1 of Terrebonne Parish v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
P. 59(e); Anderson v. Martco L.L.C., 852 F. App’x 858 , 859 (5th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (citing Templet v. HydroChem Inc., 367 F.3d 473, 477 (5th Cir. 2004)). 4 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 5 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 6 Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 475 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bruce v. BP p.l.c.
Tex.2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990)). 9 Castrillo, 2010 WL 1424398 , at *4. 10 See generally R.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lewis v. Louisiana State University
Tex.2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990)). for reconsideration supports the Plaintiff’s motion with respect to La.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Becht v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
May 4, 2009). 6 Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989). 7 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 8 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 9 Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 475 . properly before this Court without express modification of the protective order by Judge Cannon.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Truxillo v. National Maintenance & Repair of Louisiana, Inc.
Corp. v. Meyer, 781 F.2d 1260, 1268 (7th Cir. 1986) (internal citations omitted)). 6 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). reason for reconsideration other than mere disagreement with a prior order, reconsideration is a waste of judicial time and resources and should not be granted.7 B.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Fairway Village Condominiums v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 13 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gulf Island Shipyards, LLC v. LaShip, LLC
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bradford v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation
Corp. v. Meyer, 781 F.2d 1260, 1268 (7th Cir. 1986) (internal citations omitted)). 7 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 8 Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 475 . of Defendant’s requested 21-day extension.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Scott v. Westbank Fishing, LLC
(2×)
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 7 should not be granted.46 IV.Analysis Defendant urges the Court to reconsider its June 23, 2022 Order granting Plaintiff’s motion to strike certain witnesses who were not listed in Defendant’s witness list.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sanchez De La Rosa v. King
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 53 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Collins v. Benton
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 132 Templet, 367 F.3d at 478–79. 133 Schiller, 342 F.3d at 567 . 134 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Farrier v. Louisiana State
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 19 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Collins v. Benton
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 82 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kitziger v. Gulfstream Services, Inc.
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 68 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Great Lakes Insurance, S.E. v. Gray Group Investments, LLC
Accordingly, considering the record, the oral and written arguments and representations of counsel, and the applicable law, for these reasons and as those more fully stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECE No. 62) is DENIED. oD aedaby SCURRAULT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE See Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, 303 F.3d 571 , 581 (5th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted); Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (Sth Cir. 1990) (citations omitted); Simon v. United States, F.2d 1154, 1159 (Sth Cir. 1990); Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (Sth Cir. 1…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Collins v. Benton
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 18 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wiley v. Department of Energy
May 4, 2009). 4 Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989). 5 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 6 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 7 Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 475 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michael G. Stag, LLC v. Stuart H. Smith, LLC
May 4, 2009). 4 Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989). 5 Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990). 6 See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990). 7 Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 475 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 49 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 65 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 50 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
EMIII Holdings, LLC v. First NBC Bank
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 10 resources and should not be granted.70 C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 130 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hampton v. Praetorian Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 131 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 98 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 81 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 16 other than mere disagreement with a prior order, reconsideration is a waste of judicial time and resources and should not be granted.113 IV.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Blythe v. Offshore Service Vessels, L.L.C.
Tex. 2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990)). 59 Livingston Downs Racing Ass’n v. Jefferson Downs Corp., 259 F. Supp. 2d 471, 481 (M.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Mansour Sanjar
Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Chapman v. LHC Group, Inc.
Corp. v. Alpha Scientific Corp., 483 F.Supp.2d 538, 539 (E.D.Tex.2007) (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990)). .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. Snowizard Holdings, Inc.
Helena Labs., 483 F.Supp.2d at 539 (citing Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990)). .
cited
Cited "see"
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Truong
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Walmart Headquarters
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Vinet v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Carl Green v. City of Moss Point, MS
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Del Prado v. BN DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990) (citations omitted) (“Generally speaking a party may not raise an argument for the first time in a petition for rehearing.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Small Business Admin v. Beaulieu
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990) (holding that the reversal of a judgment cannot inure to the benefit of a party that was not named in the notice of appeal). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Helena Laboratories Corp. v. Alpha Scientific Corp.
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Winburn
See Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553 (5th Cir.1989) (barring fraud claim because defendant could have raised claim in original Title 1983 action by invoking bankruptcy jurisdiction of District Court), reh’g denied, 894 F.2d 99 (5th Cir. 1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walters v. Betts (In Re Betts)
Accord Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553, 563 (5th Cir.1989), reh’g denied, 894 F.2d 99 (1990); Patino’s, Inc. v. Poston, 735 F.2d 866 , 870 n. 3 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1086 , 105 S.Ct. 591 , 83 L.Ed.2d 700 (1984). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
In The Matter Of Meyerland Co.
See Northshore Development, Inc. v. Lee, 835 F.2d 580, 583 (5th Cir.1988) and Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553, 557 (5th Cir.1989), reh'g denied, 894 F.2d 99 (5th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyerland Co.
See Northshore Development, Inc. v. Lee, 835 F.2d 580, 583 (5th Cir.1988) and Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553, 557 (5th Cir.1989), reh’g denied, 894 F.2d 99 (5th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
MILTON LEE LEVERETTE v. LOUISVILLE LADDER COMPANY
See Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jane H. Browning, Individually and as Co-Independent of the Estate of William W. Browning, Jr.
v.
Don Navarro, Individually and as Trustee for Pat S. Holloway, Pat S. Holloway, Jane H. Browning v. Don Navarro
v.
Don Navarro, Individually and as Trustee for Pat S. Holloway, Pat S. Holloway, Jane H. Browning v. Don Navarro
88-1761.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 26, 1990.
Published
Jane H. BROWNING, Individually and as Co-Independent
Executrix of the Estate of William W. Browning,
Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Don NAVARRO, Individually and as Trustee for Pat S.
Holloway, et al., Defendants,
Pat S. Holloway, Defendant-Appellant.
Jane H. BROWNING, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Don NAVARRO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 88-1761, 88-1894.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 26, 1990.
Pat S. Holloway, pro se.
R. Jack Ayres, Jr., Thomas V. Murto, III, Law Offices of R. Jack Ayres, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
J. Albert Kroemer, Dallas, Tex., for Robbie Holloway.
Appeals from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas.
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Oct. 23, 1989, 5 Cir., 1989, 887 F.2d 553)
Before POLITZ, DAVIS and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
DUHE, Circuit Judge:
[*~99]1
In Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553 (5th Cir.1989) (Browning III ), we held that the preclusive effect of Holloway v. Walker, 784 F.2d 1287 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 984, 107 S.Ct. 571, 93 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986) barred the Holloways from attacking a state court judgment (the Walker judgment) on the ground that it was fraudulently obtained. The result of our decision was to allow the judgment creditors, the Brownings, to retain the spoils of their state court victory. The Holloways now seek a rehearing. All of the arguments which they make, except one, were dealt with in Browning III and we will not revisit them. The Holloways now argue on rehearing, for the first time, that Robbie Holloway should not be precluded by res judicata because she was not a party to Holloway v. Walker.
[*~100]2
Generally speaking a party may not raise an argument for the first time in a petition for rehearing. See, e.g., United States v. Bigler, 817 F.2d 1139, 1140 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 842, 108 S.Ct. 130, 98 L.Ed.2d 88 (1987) and Wells v. Rushing, 760 F.2d 660, 661 (5th Cir.1985). Before we can grapple with whether Robbie Holloway is procedurally barred from raising this issue, we must decide whether she is a proper party to this appeal.
3
Robbie Holloway did not appeal the district court's judgment of May 23, 1986 which held that the Walker judgment was valid. The Brownings argue that the May 23 judgment, therefore, is final as to her. Robbie Holloway argues that the May 23 judgment was reversed in part by Browning v. Navarro, 826 F.2d 335 (5th Cir.1987) (Browning II) and that under Annat v. Beard, 277 F.2d 554, 558 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 908, 81 S.Ct. 270, 5 L.Ed.2d 223 (1960) she should be allowed to share in the fruits of Pat Holloway's partial victory in Browning II.
4
There is language in Annat which supports Robbie Holloway's position. The Annat court stated "A reversal on appeal does not inure to the benefit of those who did not join in the appeal unless the interests of the non-appealing parties are so interwoven and dependent as to be inseparable." 277 F.2d at 558. This language, however, is no longer good law in light of Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 487 U.S. 312, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 101 L.Ed.2d 285 (1988). The Torres Court held that the failure to name a party in the notice of appeal was a jurisdictional defect. Id. 108 S.Ct. at 2409. Thus we did not have jurisdiction over Robbie Holloway in Browning II and our decision to reverse could not inure to her benefit.
5
The petition for rehearing, therefore, is DENIED.