United States v. Enrique Mendoza, Jr., 902 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Enrique Mendoza, Jr., 902 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Theortres Parham, United States of America v. Thomas Charles Johnson, A/K/A T.C. Johnson (ca8, 1994-04-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Theortres Parham, United States of America v. Thomas Charles Johnson, A/K/A T.C. Johnson (2×)
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whitfield v. Democratic Party of Arkansas, 902 F.2d 15 (8th Cir.1990) (en banc).
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee,
v.
Enrique MENDOZA, Jr., Defendant/Appellant
89-10215.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 5, 1990.
902 F.2d 15
Wiggins, Kozinski, Quackenbush.
Published

ORDER

The opinion filed November 17,1989, 890 F.2d 176 (9th Cir.1989) and amended March 16, 1990 is withdrawn and vacated. The mandate issued on April 10, 1990 is recalled.

SO ORDERED.

ORDER

We dismiss this appeal. In this appeal, Mendoza challenged the propriety of the sentencing court’s upward departure from the applicable Guideline range. In an opinion issued on November 17, 1989, and amended on March 16, 1990, we vacated that sentence and remanded for resentenc-ing. On May 1, 1990, we vacated the amended opinion with the intent of publishing a new opinion. However, on December 20, 1989, after the first opinion was issued, Mendoza was resentenced within the applicable Guideline range. Because he does not challenge the propriety of his new sentence, any discussion of the propriety of his[*16] previous sentence is no longer necessary or appropriate.

APPEAL DISMISSED.