green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.4 score
“catanzano i”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark
See, United States v. Sanchez, 719 F.Supp. 128, 133 (E.D.N.Y.1989), aff'd, 902 F.2d 1556 (2d Cir.1990); 4 W.
discussed
Cited "see"
George R. Ford v. Benson Title Commonwealth Insurance, Inc. Edwardsville State Bank Norman Steffey Gary L. Hall William M. Modrcin
See Cornett v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 684 F.Supp. 78, 79 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (dismissing pro se plaintiff's RICO complaint for failing to plead with particularity), aff'd, 902 F.2d 1556 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 754 (1991). 7 The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED. 8 The mandate shall issue forthwith. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estop…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scopo
See also United States v. Sanchez, 719 F.Supp. 128, 132-33 (E.D.N.Y.1989), aff'd without opinion, 902 F.2d 1556 (2d Cir.1990). 7 The government responds to this conclusion by arguing that the detectives’ precautions on the evening in question did not convert the investigative stop into an arrest because the detectives merely conducted themselves in a manner warranted by the possibility of danger.
Catanzano
v.
Richardson
v.
Richardson
89-9163.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 19, 1990.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
Catanzano
v.
Richardson
NO. 89-9163
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
MAR 19, 1990
1
Appeal From: W.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED.