James R. Kimsey v. William B. Coulter, Ohio Bd. of Regents, Unknown Members, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
James R. Kimsey v. William B. Coulter, Ohio Bd. of Regents, Unknown Members, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Thompson v. Richard Stapleton (ca6, 2010-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" John Thompson v. Richard Stapleton
6th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Love v. Farley, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir.1991) (unpublished); see also Wolff, 418 U.S. at 570 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 .
discussed Cited "see" Dennis H. Huguley v. General Motors Corporation (2×)
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See 128 F.R.D. 81, 83 (E.D.Mich.1989), aff'd, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 304 , 116 L.Ed.2d 247 (1991).
cited Cited "see" Dennis H. Huguley Ruth E. Dunn v. General Motors Corporation
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See 128 F.R.D. 81, 89 (E.D.Mich.1989), aff 'd, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 304 , 116 L.Ed.2d 247 (1991).
cited Cited "see" Huguley v. General Motors Corp.
E.D. Mich. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Huguley v. General Motors Corp., 128 F.R.D. 81 (E.D.Mich. 1989), aff'd, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 304 , 116 L.Ed.2d 247 (1991).
cited Cited "see" Allen Payne v. General Motors Corporation
10th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Huguley v. General Motors Corp., 128 F.R.D. 81 (E.D.Mich.1989) (approving consent decree), aff'd, 925 F.2d 1464 (6th Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James R. Kimsey
v.
William B. Coulter, Ohio Board of Regents, Unknown Members
90-3515.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 12, 1991.
925 F.2d 1464
Unpublished

925 F.2d 1464

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James R. KIMSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William B. COULTER, Ohio Board of Regents, Unknown Members,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-3515.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1991.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, and RYAN and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

James R. Kimsey, a pro se Ohio prisoner, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

Seeking damages, injunctive and declaratory relief, Kimsey sued the Ohio Board of Regents and its Chancellor, Coulter, alleging that he had been unconstitutionally denied the equal protection of the laws of Ohio when his application for an Ohio Instructional Grant (OIG) was denied. Specifically, he challenged the provisions of Ohio Rev.Code Sec. 3333.12(c) which denies grants to inmates unless they are eligible for parole within five years of the grant application. In addition, Kimsey asserted that the denial of his OIG application constituted handicap discrimination because he is handicapped.

3

After a review of the record, the district court granted summary judgment for defendants. Kimsey has filed a timely appeal.

4

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment because the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 862 F.2d 597, 601 (6th Cir.1988).

5

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.