United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708), George Mooneyham (89-5710), 932 F.2d 1146 (6th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708), George Mooneyham (89-5710), 932 F.2d 1146 (6th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rhoden v. Morgan (tnmd, 1994-08-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rhoden v. Morgan
M.D. Tenn. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Morrow, 923 F.2d 427, 432 (6th Cir.1991) (constitutionally effective assistance despite counsel’s failure to move for new trial or acquittal where evidence -constitutionally insufficient), vacated on other grounds, 932 F.2d 1146 (6th Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Paul J. Abrams (90-3973), Ulysses Greene, Jr. (90-3974)
6th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Morrow, 923 F.2d 427, 430 (6th Cir.), rehearing granted, 932 F.2d 1146 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708), George Mooneyham (89-5710)
89-5418.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
May 6, 1991.
932 F.2d 1146
Published

932 F.2d 1146

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy Wayne MORROW (89-5418/5708), George Mooneyham
(89-5710), Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 89-5418, 89-5708 and 89-5710.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

May 6, 1991.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court 923 F.2d 427 (6th Cir.1991) is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.