Cummins v. Sullivan, 932 F.2d 965 (5th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Cummins v. Sullivan, 932 F.2d 965 (5th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (nj, 1995-11-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (2×)
N.J. · 1995 · signal: accord · confidence high
The court in Greenwood Trust also cited several cases to support the proposition that section 85 "adopts the entire case law of [a state bank's home] state interpreting the state's limitations on usury; it does not merely incorporate the numerical rate adopted by the state." 971 F. 2d at 829 (citing First Nat'l Bank v. *55 Nowlin, 509 F. 2d 872, 876 (8th Cir.1975); accord Roper v. Consurve, Inc., 777 F. Supp. 508, 510-11 (S.D.Miss. 1990), aff'd, 932 F. 2d 965 (5th Cir.) (table), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 861 , 112 S.Ct. 181 , 116 L.Ed. 2d 142 (1991); Daggs v. Phoenix Nat'l Bank, 177 U.S. 549, 555…
discussed Cited "see" Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
We so hold, much bolstered by the recognition that section 85 “adopts the entire case law of [a state bank’s home] state interpreting the state’s limitations on usury; it does not merely incorporate the numerical rate adopted by the state.” First Nat’l Bank v. Nowlin, 509 F.2d 872, 876 (8th Cir.1975); accord Roper v. Consurve, Inc., 777 F.Supp. 508, 510-11 (S.D.Miss. 1990), aff'd, 932 F.2d 965 (5th Cir.) (table), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 181 , 116 L.Ed.2d 142 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cummins
v.
Sullivan
90-8629.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 23, 1991.
932 F.2d 965
Published

932 F.2d 965

Cummins
v.
Sullivan[*]

NO. 90-8629

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

APR 23, 1991

1

Appeal From: W.D.Tex.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2