Merle E. Miller v. Dep't of Def., 954 F.2d 733 (Fed. Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Merle E. Miller v. Dep't of Def., 954 F.2d 733 (Fed. Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tetzlaff (uscfc, 2015-11-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Tetzlaff
Fed. Cl. · 2015 · confidence medium
"Thus[,] questions raised [regarding] the scope of employer/employee definitions under the [FLSA], and the proper interpretation of the ... test for distinguishing employees from independent contractors, are beside the point." Guevara, 954 F.2d at 733.
discussed Cited "see" Schlabach v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Atlas Funding Corp. through Kersting v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 137, 140 (1991), aff'd, 954 F.2d 733 (Fed.Cir.1992) (Table); see also Farnum v. United States, 813 F.2d 114, 115-16 (7th Cir.1987); I.R.C. § 6671(a); I.R.C. § 6702(a). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fry v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Nat’l Bank v. United States, 69 F.3d 1571, 1576-77 (Fed.Cir.1995) (“enforcement action [of the constitutional tax assessment], including seizure of the property, could not be challenged as a taking”); see also First Atlas Corp. v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 137, 141 (1991), aff'd per curiam, 954 F.2d 733 (Fed.Cir.1992) (concluding that the filing of a notice of a hen, standing alone, does not constitute a taking); Castillo Morales v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 342, 345 (1990) (holding that the court does not have jurisdiction over takings claims, because “where [...] a taxpayer disputes an…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Merle E. Miller
v.
Department of Defense
91-3287.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 18, 1992.
954 F.2d 733
Unpublished

954 F.2d 733

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Merle E. MILLER, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent.

No. 91-3287.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 13, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 18, 1992.

Before PLAGER, LOURIE and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.