Webster v. Gibson, 966 F.2d 1459 (8th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Webster v. Gibson, 966 F.2d 1459 (8th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Caldwell v. Bowers (arwd, 2024-07-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Caldwell v. Bowers
W.D. Ark. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Moore, 966 F.2d 1459 (Table), 1992 WL 120398, at *1 (8th Cir. June 5, 1992) (per curiam) (citing Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th Cir. 1985) (prisoner’s claims for injunctive relief were moot because prisoner was transferred to a different facility and no longer subject to those conditions)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Webster
v.
John Frank Gibson, Prosecuting Attorney, Ashley County, Ar James H. Robinson, Sheriff, Ashley County, Ar, Rex Harris, Sheriff/investigator, Ashley County, Ar
91-3222.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jun 25, 1992.
966 F.2d 1459
Unpublished

966 F.2d 1459

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Anthony WEBSTER, Appellant,
v.
John Frank GIBSON, Prosecuting Attorney, Ashley County, AR;
James H. Robinson, Sheriff, Ashley County, AR, Rex
Harris, Sheriff/Investigator, Ashley
County, AR, Appellees.

No. 91-3222WA.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 17, 1992.
Filed: June 25, 1992.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Anthony Webster, an Arkansas prisoner, appeals from the district court's order that adopted the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After considering the parties' arguments and reviewing the record, we find no error of law in the district court's ruling. We therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.