Neal v. United States, 113 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Neal v. United States, 113 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“inferences and opinions must be grounded on more than flights of fancy, speculations, hunches, intuitions or rumors; discrimination law would be unmanageable if disgruntled employees could defeat summary judgment by speculating about the defendant's motives.”
46 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ronalldus Thompson v. North American Lighting, Inc. (alnd, 2026-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ronalldus Thompson v. North American Lighting, Inc.
N.D. Ala. · 2026 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
inferences and opinions must be grounded on more than flights of fancy, speculations, hunches, intuitions or rumors; discrimination law would be unmanageable if disgruntled employees could defeat summary judgment by speculating about the defendant's motives.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neal
v.
United States
96-8273.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 23, 1997.
113 F.3d 1251
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case

113 F.3d 1251

Neal
v.
U.S.[*]

NO. 96-8273

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Apr 23, 1997

Appeal From: M.D.Ga. ,No.95001581CV1DF

1

Affirmed.

*

Fed.R.App.P.34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-4