Marathon Oil Co. v. A. G. Ruhrgas, 129 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Marathon Oil Co. v. A. G. Ruhrgas, 129 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. (scotus, 1999-05-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. (2×)
SCOTUS · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See 129 F. 3d 746 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Holdren v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
D. Mass. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Marathon Oil Co. v. Ruhrgas, A.G., 115 F.3d 315 , 318 & n. 7 (5th Cir.1997) (noting "the overwhelming body of precedent commanding all federal courts to scrutinize assiduously subject matter jurisdiction at each stage of litigation, trial and appellate, and to dismiss cases not properly before us”), vacated on other grounds, 129 F.3d 746 (5th Cir.1997).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pacheco De Perez v. AT&T Co.
11th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Marathon Oil Co. v. Ruhrgas, 115 F.3d 315 (5th Cir.1997), petition for reh'g en banc granted, 129 F.3d 746 (Nov. 17, 1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marathon Oil Company, Marathon International Oil Company, Marathon Petroleum Norge A/s, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
v.
A. G. Ruhrgas, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
96-20361.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 17, 1997.
129 F.3d 746
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: Mississippi Supreme Court (1) · Washington Supreme Court (1)

129 F.3d 746

MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Marathon International Oil Company,
Marathon Petroleum Norge A/S,
Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,
v.
A. G. RUHRGAS, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 96-20361.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1997.

Clifton T. Hutchinson, J. Gregory Taylor, David John Schenck, Hughes & Luce, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Ben H. Sheppard, Jr., Guy Stanford Lipe, Michael John Mucchetti, Harry M. Reasoner, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, TX, for Ruhrgas.

Peter Heidenberger, Thomas G. Corcoran, Jr., Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, Washington, DC, for Federal Republic of Germany, Amicus Curiae.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Melinda Harmon, Judge.

(Opinion June 10, 1997, 5 Cir., 1997, 115 F.3d 315)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.