Whiting v. Singletary, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Whiting v. Singletary, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“to survive summary judgment, a party does not necessarily 14 have to produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial, as long as the party satisfies 15 the requirements of federal rules of civil procedure 56.”
41 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pekrins v. Angulo (casd, 2021-03-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Pekrins v. Angulo
S.D. Cal. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
to survive summary judgment, a party does not 14 necessarily have to produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial, as long as 15 the party satisfies the requirements of federal rules of civil procedure 56.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Freteluco v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see"
D. Nev. · 2020 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
to survive summary judgment, a party does not necessarily 14 have to produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial, as long as the party satisfies 15 the requirements of federal rules of civil procedure 56.
cited Cited "see" (PC) Hill v. Rios
E.D. Cal. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lolli v. County of Orange, 351 13 F.3d 410 , 415 (9th Cir. 2003) (discussing standards applicable to pretrial detainees). 14 Accordingly, an objective reasonableness standard applies.
cited Cited "see" In re Vicars Insurance Agency, Inc.
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Downing v. Halliburton & Assoc., 812 F.Supp. 1175, 1182 (M.D.Ala.1993), aff 'd, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir.1994); In re Sahlen & Assoc.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aeropower, Ltd. v. Matherly
M.D. Ala. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Downing v. Halliburton & Assocs., Inc., 812 F.Supp. 1175, 1182-83 (M.D.Ala. 1993) (finding commission of twelve acts completed within eight-month period did not constitute an "ongoing, continuous criminal 'pattern of racketeering’ ”), aff'd without opinion, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir.1994); Uni *Quality, Inc. v. Infotronx, Inc., 974 F.2d 918, 922 (7th Cir.1992) (court concluded that "one scheme that lasted at most seven to eight months” was "precisely the type of short-term, elosed-ended fraud that ... [the Seventh Circuit] has held does not constitute a pattern"). 24 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whiting
v.
Singletary
93-2327.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 4, 1994.
13 F.3d 410

13 F.3d 410

Whiting
v.
Singletary[*]

NO. 93-2327

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Jan 04, 1994

1

Appeal From: M.D.Fla.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3