green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.4 score
“to survive summary judgment, a party does not necessarily 14 have to produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial, as long as the party satisfies 15 the requirements of federal rules of civil procedure 56.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pekrins v. Angulo
to survive summary judgment, a party does not 14 necessarily have to produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial, as long as 15 the party satisfies the requirements of federal rules of civil procedure 56.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Freteluco v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
to survive summary judgment, a party does not necessarily 14 have to produce evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial, as long as the party satisfies 15 the requirements of federal rules of civil procedure 56.
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Hill v. Rios
See Lolli v. County of Orange, 351 13 F.3d 410 , 415 (9th Cir. 2003) (discussing standards applicable to pretrial detainees). 14 Accordingly, an objective reasonableness standard applies.
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Vicars Insurance Agency, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of United National Insurance Company, Creditor, Diamond State Insurance Company, Creditor, and Hallmark Insurance Company, Creditor. In the Matter of E&s Facilities, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of United National Insurance Company, Creditor, and Diamond State Insurance Company, Creditor
See Downing v. Halliburton & Assoc., 812 F.Supp. 1175, 1182 (M.D.Ala.1993), aff'd, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir.1994); In re Sahlen & Assoc.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Vicars Insurance Agency, Inc.
See Downing v. Halliburton & Assoc., 812 F.Supp. 1175, 1182 (M.D.Ala.1993), aff 'd, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir.1994); In re Sahlen & Assoc.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aeropower, Ltd. v. Matherly
See also Downing v. Halliburton & Assocs., Inc., 812 F.Supp. 1175, 1182-83 (M.D.Ala. 1993) (finding commission of twelve acts completed within eight-month period did not constitute an "ongoing, continuous criminal 'pattern of racketeering’ ”), aff'd without opinion, 13 F.3d 410 (11th Cir.1994); Uni *Quality, Inc. v. Infotronx, Inc., 974 F.2d 918, 922 (7th Cir.1992) (court concluded that "one scheme that lasted at most seven to eight months” was "precisely the type of short-term, elosed-ended fraud that ... [the Seventh Circuit] has held does not constitute a pattern"). 24 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whiting
v.
Singletary
v.
Singletary
93-2327.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 4, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. California (1) · D. Nevada (1)
Whiting
v.
Singletary[*]
NO. 93-2327
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 04, 1994
1
Appeal From: M.D.Fla.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3