green
Positive treatment
16.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kimball v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. 2 denied, 118 S.Ct. 1364 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mehaffey v. Navient Solutions, LLC
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997); see also Buell Cabinet Co. v. Sudduth, 608 F.2d 431, 433 (10th Cir. 1979) (“Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”). 2 III.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Castro v. Zurich American Insurance Company
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Viegelahn, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Ruben's Auto Sales
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997)); accord Petro Harvester Operating Co. v. Keith, 954 F.3d 686 (5th Cir. 2020).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Estate of Bleck ex rel. Churchill v. City of Alamosa
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hansard Mining, Inc. v. McLean
James Barlow Fam., 132 F.3d at 1320. ¶17 As for the McLeans’ homestead patent, the Homestead Act permitted a qualified person to enter unappropriated public lands for the purpose of establishing a homestead.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bleck v. City of Alamosa
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Garcia v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
COMMON CAUSE OF COLORADO v. Buescher
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Wright
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rexrode v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997); see also Buell Cabinet Co. v. Sudduth, 608 F.2d 431, 433 (10th Cir.1979) (“Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”). 2 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bonham v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance v. Cutrone
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Green v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Deaton v. Gutierrez
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1320 (10th Cir.1997), we note that Barlow addresses mining patents and, as such, is of limited assistance.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Barnett v. Life Insurance Investors Co. of America
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lextron, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Munson, Inc. 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Garcia v. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc.
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Estate of Davenport
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Martin v. Stites
(2×)
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Power Engineering Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Villescas v. Richardson
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
US West, Inc. v. Business Discount Plan, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ford v. Fleming
Munson, Inc. , 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sanpete Water Conservancy District v. Carbon Water Conservancy District
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 , 118 S.Ct. 1364 , 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of Wichita
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997); see also Buell Cabinet Co. v. Sudduth, 608 F.2d 431, 433 (10th Cir.1979) (“Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. Samson Resources Co
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
US Ex Rel. Holeman v. CITY OF COMMERCE CITY, CO.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Power Engineering Co. v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. Life Investors Ins.
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1048 (1998).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
ERA Franchise v. Northern Insurance
Munson, Inc. , 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1048 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hill v. Martinez
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Arenberg v. Central United Life Insurance
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1319 (10th Cir.1997) (citing Harrison Western Corp. v. Gulf Oil Co., 662 F.2d 690, 692 (10th Cir.1981)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Payne v. Clarendon National Insurance (In re Sunset Sales, Inc.)
The Tenth Circuit has also stated that it has “inherent authority to recall the mandate for the purpose of clarifying an ambiguous prior order of the court.” James Barlow, 132 F.3d at 1316; see Calderon, — U.S. at -, 118 S.Ct. at 1501 (recognizing that a party can have no interest in preserving a mandate not in accordance with the actual decision rendered by the court).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mein v. Pool Co. Disabled International Employee Long Term Disability Benefit Plan
Munson, Inc., 132 F.3d 1316, 1318 (10th Cir.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Barlow Family Limited Partnership John and Lois Haun Family Partnership Barlow & Haun, Inc. L.A. McPeek and Company Barbara B. Crews B.J. Bradshaw Estate, by First Interstate Bank of Utah, Trustee Alpha Exploration, Inc. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
v.
David M. Munson, Inc., United States of America, Amicus Curiae
v.
David M. Munson, Inc., United States of America, Amicus Curiae
96-1202.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Dec 15, 1997.
Published
JAMES BARLOW FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; John and Lois Haun
Family Partnership; Barlow & Haun, Inc.; L.A. McPeek and
Company; Barbara B. Crews; B.J. Bradshaw Estate, by First
Interstate Bank of Utah, Trustee; Alpha Exploration, Inc.;
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DAVID M. MUNSON, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Amicus Curiae.
No. 96-1202.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 1997.
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, and HENRY and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
[*~1316]1
The Barlows have filed a motion to clarify our order and opinion on rehearing. Because our mandate issued on November 21, 1997, we treat the motion as one to recall the mandate. Under our inherent authority to recall the mandate for the purpose of clarifying an ambiguous prior order of the court, see Coleman v. Turpen, 827 F.2d 667, 671 (10th Cir.1987); Dilley v. Alexander, 627 F.2d 407, 410-411 (D.C.Cir.1980), we grant the motion and recall the mandate.
[*~1323]2
We clarify the opinion by eliminating the phrase on page 3 stating that we grant summary judgment in favor of Munson and by stating instead that we remand the matter for further consideration. In addition, on the last page we eliminate the phrase "and Munson thus has a complete defense to the nonpayment of royalties to the Barrows."